Technical Help needed !

Status
Not open for further replies.

N1SQB

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2003
Messages
2,996
Reaction score
542
Location
Somewhere On Earth
Ok, I am trying to build a cirquit board for an LED signal strength meter project to be used on my Pro-2006 scanner. It uses an LM 3914 IC chip which will drive 10 LEds. Now, I am comfortable with this build as I have studied it fowards and backwards. One part of the schematics calls for a 2.2-uF capacitor. I cannot seem to find one nearby. So I toyed with the idea of using a 10 uF one that I do already have.
Can someone tell me what harm will be done if I use a capacitor with a larger value than the smaller one that is called for? It's been a while since I took to the mod books! LOL...

Manny
 

gewecke

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
7,452
Reaction score
17
Location
Illinois
Ok, I am trying to build a cirquit board for an LED signal strength meter project to be used on my Pro-2006 scanner. It uses an LM 3914 IC chip which will drive 10 LEds. Now, I am comfortable with this build as I have studied it fowards and backwards. One part of the schematics calls for a 2.2-uF capacitor. I cannot seem to find one nearby. So I toyed with the idea of using a 10 uF one that I do already have.
Can someone tell me what harm will be done if I use a capacitor with a larger value than the smaller one that is called for? It's been a while since I took to the mod books! LOL...

Manny

Without the schematic it's hard to say, but with led drivers like that one usually the component tolerance should be kept close. Maybe clip it in and give it a try?


73,
n9zas
 

davidgcet

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
1,377
Reaction score
122
can you find sizes that would either add up or divide down to 2.2uf if you series/parallel them? i would think using a larger cap would delay level change indications, depending on where it is in the circuit of course.
 

gmclam

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
6,501
Reaction score
677
Location
Fair Oaks, CA
2.2uF

It depends on where in the circuit the 2.2uF capacitor is used. If it is used for power supply filtering, then 10uF will be fine. If it is used for coupling, we'll need to know more about the circuit. If it is used for timing, then you'll want to get it as close to the value as you can, or otherwise perhaps change a resistor value to compensate.

Another factor is the voltage rating of the capacitor. You can certainly use virtually any higher voltage rating than it calls for. For example, if it says 10uF at 10V, then 12v, 16v or 25v ratings would be great.

I'd look for a 2.2uF at a higher voltage before using a different capacitance, unless it is power supply filtering, in which case higher capacitance is fine.
 

N1SQB

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2003
Messages
2,996
Reaction score
542
Location
Somewhere On Earth
Well, the best that I have been able to do to keep things "close" to what the schematics call for is running two 1.0uF capacitors in series. So I will only be .02 off. The voltage is exactly what the schematics ask for. What do you guys think, pretty close no? I will see what I can do about getting a picture of the schematics.

Manny
 
Last edited:

WA1ATA

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
416
Reaction score
4
Location
Fairhaven MA / San Jose CA / Kihei HI
Well, the best that I have been able to do to keep things "close" to what the schematics call for is running two 1.0uF capacitors in series.
You need to put the two 1uF capacitors in parallel, not series.

In parallel, two 1uF capacitors are 2uF. In series, they are 0.5uF.

As another posted noted above, if the capacitor is just used for filtering the power supply then, within reasonable values, bigger is better.

The voltage rating doesn't matter, as long as the rating is higher than the voltage seen by the capacitor.
 

WA1ATA

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
416
Reaction score
4
Location
Fairhaven MA / San Jose CA / Kihei HI
Since pin 5 is the signal that is being monitored, the function of C1, in combination with R2 is to provide some filtering on the input signal. In other words, the time constant of C1 * R2 determines how fast the LEDs change in response to a change in the signal strength.

Since the impedance at pin 5 is high (draws 100nA max), you could have just used the 1uF cap and multiplied the value of R2 by a factor of 2.2.
 

com501

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
1,614
Reaction score
428
Location
127.0.0.1
Since pin 5 is the signal that is being monitored, the function of C1, in combination with R2 is to provide some filtering on the input signal. In other words, the time constant of C1 * R2 determines how fast the LEDs change in response to a change in the signal strength.

Since the impedance at pin 5 is high (draws 100nA max), you could have just used the 1uF cap and multiplied the value of R2 by a factor of 2.2.

That would involve knowing basic electronics.
 

N1SQB

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2003
Messages
2,996
Reaction score
542
Location
Somewhere On Earth
Since the impedance at pin 5 is high (draws 100nA max), you could have just used the 1uF cap and multiplied the value of R2 by a factor of 2.2.

I didn't think about that! I have not built the project yet so I may just do that. I have the resistor I would need too. Hmmm! Thanks for the suggestion!


Thanks to everyone who gave their good their advise in one way or another. I really do appreciate it! I will post pictures or maybe even a video link when all is said and done!

Manny/N1SQB
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top