tone search continues

[jeffreyinberthoud]

would it be a safe assumtion to believe thatr Larimie county wyoming fire at 154.310 is toned at 100.9 since county so is????

 

[eyes00only]

I'm sure you looked, but I don't see 154.310 listed in the database for LARAMIE county.

Jerry

 

[jeffreyinberthoud]

tone search

yes I looked and found it on two sites

 

[ffhfan]

I'm not doubting the frequency, just the tone - 100.9 is not a standard APCO Private Line tone. My list goes from 100.0 to 103.5.

 

[eyes00only]

Wouldn't 100.9 be between 100.0 & 103.5 :?: :roll: .

Jerry

 

[Halfpint]

Wouldn't 100.9 be between 100.0 & 103.5 :?: :roll: .

Jerry

I suspect that he *might* be having a bit of `confusion' with 110.9? Every `list' *I* have also *doesn't* show anything between 100.0 and 103.5 *but* *does* show 110.9. {GRIN!}

 

[scanlist]

I've always heard Laramie County Fire Net 155.715 (162.2)

Simulcast on the Cheyenne 800 system as well.

S.O. & Cheynne PD use 100.0

Phil.

 

[Halfpint]

I've always heard Laramie County Fire Net 155.715 (162.2)

Simulcast on the Cheyenne 800 system as well.

S.O. & Cheynne PD use 100.0

Phil.

That makes it even `stranger?' as to *how* 100.9 managed to come up. Decoder glitch, freq counter error/faulty interpretation, or `operator error'? (If this was from a *`reading'* of the SO and CPD. *If* it came from some `list'...???) I know that one of the old `tone finders' I've got occasionally had some problems now and then. (But usually just taking the time to actually think about or look at the actual tones and it was usually resolved fairly quickly. [Fortunately, or unfortunately depending upon how one wanted to look at it, the radio it was mounted on died and they're both in "TBHFSCR" with a note about the situation and annotated `REPAIR?'.]) The `tone find and keep' unit still works, and actually is also accurate though with the advent of actual built-in capability in some scanners now it hasn't been hooked for a while now. (The PRO-2006 it is usually hooked up to has been getting used for other things these days instead.)

Oh, well... Hopefully this is the resolution of this `problem'? Thanks, Phil!

 

[jeffreyinberthoud]

Wow I guess everyone has an opinion on this wich is my Main Point we need to get a list of UHF/VHF pl tones together some of us still monitor these freqs ok we all know boulder but there are many others how about we start listing the tones we know in the data base here on site or send them to yahoo coscan but PLEASE SHARE you knowledge