ATCTech
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2002
- Messages
- 1,857
There is no intentional gain in a true multicoupler beyond amplification to overcome the splitting of the input signal to the output ports. Properly designed, they will not add RF noise because of their own internals, create mixing of various strong RF signals at their input or allow RF by-products developed in whatever devices are connected at their outputs to get back into their circuitry and therefore potentially affect the other connected devices. The entire idea of a multicoupler is to be "RF invisible" to all of it's connected devices. TV sets and related consumer devices really don't care about that because the source signals are individually so strong to begin with that the viewer will never see the RF artifacts created, analog or digital, unless they happen to live near a location like the CN Tower where the RF levels are horrendous. (Try designing/maintaining the ATC radio system at Toronto City Centre airport to meet required ICAO specs with that tower in the back yard and you'll know what I mean!)
If you want an amplifier with a $2 4-way splitter hanging on it's output then buy a TV amplifier and best of luck. If you're trying to share a clean airborne signal between multiple effectively isolated receivers then do it once and do it right. It's your money. A better antenna set-up and better feedline will win the race in all but the most RF isolated locations. In my days at Radio Shack in the late 70s/early 80s I'd estimate that 1 in every 2 of these 4-port amplified splitters we sold came back because they made the situation worse, adding more noise, bleed-through and intermod to the TV signals (particularly bad when installed on old analog cable TV of the day) than they cured. We used to keep one "open box", sell it to the customer and let them try if. If they liked the result we'd swap them for a brand new unopened unit. If they returned it then we didn't have a bunch of discounted inventory sitting around, it truly was that bad and a brilliant pre-emptive move on our part.
Trust me, we had exactly ZERO "pre-amps" of any type in any ATC receiver equipment and we checked the bandpass, linearity, input to output gain/loss figures and signal to noise of our multicouplers as part of preventive maintenance. Yes, we used multicouplers to allow one receiving antenna to feed on equipment rack of individual receivers in all of our larger radio sites. And no, the corresponding transmitters were not co-located in the same site or nearby.
I get that this is a hobby to most people here and I'm all for experimentation, I did it myself for years as I learned. But once I was introduced to and trained in actual safety-driven electronics in the ATC environment, I quickly realized the errors of my ways and out the door went all the junk radios, binder-twine cables, cheap connectors and no-name bits and pieces.
In this case, the juice is worth every penny of the squeeze to do it properly. My tagline says it all.
Cheers!
If you want an amplifier with a $2 4-way splitter hanging on it's output then buy a TV amplifier and best of luck. If you're trying to share a clean airborne signal between multiple effectively isolated receivers then do it once and do it right. It's your money. A better antenna set-up and better feedline will win the race in all but the most RF isolated locations. In my days at Radio Shack in the late 70s/early 80s I'd estimate that 1 in every 2 of these 4-port amplified splitters we sold came back because they made the situation worse, adding more noise, bleed-through and intermod to the TV signals (particularly bad when installed on old analog cable TV of the day) than they cured. We used to keep one "open box", sell it to the customer and let them try if. If they liked the result we'd swap them for a brand new unopened unit. If they returned it then we didn't have a bunch of discounted inventory sitting around, it truly was that bad and a brilliant pre-emptive move on our part.
Trust me, we had exactly ZERO "pre-amps" of any type in any ATC receiver equipment and we checked the bandpass, linearity, input to output gain/loss figures and signal to noise of our multicouplers as part of preventive maintenance. Yes, we used multicouplers to allow one receiving antenna to feed on equipment rack of individual receivers in all of our larger radio sites. And no, the corresponding transmitters were not co-located in the same site or nearby.
I get that this is a hobby to most people here and I'm all for experimentation, I did it myself for years as I learned. But once I was introduced to and trained in actual safety-driven electronics in the ATC environment, I quickly realized the errors of my ways and out the door went all the junk radios, binder-twine cables, cheap connectors and no-name bits and pieces.
In this case, the juice is worth every penny of the squeeze to do it properly. My tagline says it all.
Cheers!