I made a number of changes to the UCAN system today. My strategy is to first get the site numbers and names corrected and then get all the frequency info corrected and finally get the talkgroups cleaned up.
Most of the site numbers and names are now correct. Duplicate sites have been deleted (eg Nelson vs. Magna). Two new sites converted from SL County in the Cottonwood canyons are now on UCAN, so those have been added, but I don't know if all the same frequencies are in place (they probably are)
Generally the names I use are either the names in the FCC database or what the UCAN radio technicians call them. There are still a few unknowns. I don't know what site number Logan Peak is and I don't know where site 34 is located (around Richfield, I think).
I've updated many of the frequencies. Frequencies in the UCAN system are hard to keep updated since they make a lot of changes. Most of the sites that have a red (data) and blue (alternate data) frequency are pretty close to current. I don't ever expect to have the frequency list perfect since it is a moving target. Most trunktrackers have "Control Channel Only" modes now, so the data channel is the most important.
The talkgroups will take some time to sift through so be patient. I'll probably try to do one city or agency at a time. I'm always interested in talkgroup submissions & corrections as well as site information in the extreme parts of the state (way down South, out West & East)
Thanks,
Brett - N7OLQ
Most of the site numbers and names are now correct. Duplicate sites have been deleted (eg Nelson vs. Magna). Two new sites converted from SL County in the Cottonwood canyons are now on UCAN, so those have been added, but I don't know if all the same frequencies are in place (they probably are)
Generally the names I use are either the names in the FCC database or what the UCAN radio technicians call them. There are still a few unknowns. I don't know what site number Logan Peak is and I don't know where site 34 is located (around Richfield, I think).
I've updated many of the frequencies. Frequencies in the UCAN system are hard to keep updated since they make a lot of changes. Most of the sites that have a red (data) and blue (alternate data) frequency are pretty close to current. I don't ever expect to have the frequency list perfect since it is a moving target. Most trunktrackers have "Control Channel Only" modes now, so the data channel is the most important.
The talkgroups will take some time to sift through so be patient. I'll probably try to do one city or agency at a time. I'm always interested in talkgroup submissions & corrections as well as site information in the extreme parts of the state (way down South, out West & East)
Thanks,
Brett - N7OLQ