This one is in the DB as:Observer1 is absolutely correct and the argument for changing a TG to "UHP Channel xx" could also be made for TG 4672 (Protective Services)
Well, that might fly for the present time, but the history of the TG is that it was assigned to Salt Lake City Community College. The UHP simply "inherited" the TG when they were awarded the contract by SLCCC to provide security for the Community College campuses. If the contract is awarded to some other entity down the road the TG will remain, but the physical group using it will be different with no connection to the UHP.I don't think we can do that and abandon TG: 22240 (SLCC Police2)...
I would be in favor of moving it to the UHP group if we could address 22240 as well.
The name I would propose would be:
19712 / UHP SLCo CH6 / UHP Salt Lake County CH6 - SLCC / Schools
Thanks for coming forward, tbogs. Yeah, it's a good idea to post on the forum any proposed changes when it involves a TG already listed because there is a reason it is listed like that (See this thread). After a robust discussion (see above posts), then we can decide, as a board of trustees, if you will, whether such a change should be made. We all have a vested interest in the Db and that each entry accurately portrays its use. We also want to give fair treatment to all suggestions.I sent this into the database. I have been monitoring this TG for months now using UniTrunker and when I hear Salt Lake UHP say switch to channel 6, I see via UniTrunker, that it is Salt Lake UHP. I haven't heard any SLCC talk...its mainly been chatting like you'd hear on a car to car channel. This has been my observation...sorry for the confusion.