Unication (G2-G5) Adjacent Channel Selectivity Specification

[K4EET]

In the Wiki for Unication voice pagers at:

Unication Voice Pager Receivers - The RadioReference Wiki

wiki.radioreference.com

in the Comparison table of the different models under the Adjacent Channel Selectivity specification, the G2 through G5 models are showing 760 dB.

Now that is HUGE!!! For some reason, I am a little skeptical of that value.

Perhaps somebody with more smarts than me could check that specification and edit the Wiki. I have never edited a Wiki before and do not want to mess it up.

 

[K9KLC]

I haven't been to the wiii for the Unication but if it helps here's a link to the manual which has the specs. Yes someone should edit the wiki if that's what's actually there. I tend not to trust most wiki's or any AI information. Usually the manual or tech spec sheets are what I use when it honestly matters. Truthfully prior to today I had never looked up the Adjacent Channel Selectivity for the Unication.

https://www.rayspagersales.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/G-Series-P25-Voice-Pager-User-Manual-G2-G3-G4-G5.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOorwjuZqabMo4dx7SnvpLjjjq-CWbL7yUVfMZoBEy1Aj3iu70EPU

Some interesting specifications there listed. I had honestly never looked.

 

[AK9R]

The great thing about a wiki is that it is a user-editable resource. That includes the RadioReference Wiki.

The Unication article in the RR Wiki has been revised with the adjacent channel selectivity numbers reported in the manual.

 

[K9KLC]

The great thing about a wiki is that it is a user-editable resource. That includes the RadioReference Wiki.

The Unication article in the RR Wiki has been revised with the adjacent channel selectivity numbers reported in the manual.

Yes, as long as accuracy, honesty and integrity come into play then yes, it's a great thing. I honestly see some other things there not up to date, so I'll eventually try and get into my first wiki edit and see if I can bring that up to date. I tend not to do things like that having never done them but I guess I can be part of the problem or part of the solution.

 

[K4EET]

<snip> I honestly see some other things there not up to date, so I'll eventually try and get into my first wiki edit and see if I can bring that up to date. I tend not to do things like that having never done them but I guess I can be part of the problem or part of the solution.

I’ll get up the nerve and try my first Wiki edit one of these days too. If it is easy to edit, maybe I won’t goof it up too bad. LOL 😂

 

[K9KLC]

I’ll get up the nerve and try my first Wiki edit one of these days too. If it is easy to edit, maybe I won’t goof it up too bad. LOL 😂

I guess first times for a lot of things can be a bit intimidating. I just didn't want to make things worse LOL.

 

[K4EET]

<snip> I just didn't want to make things worse LOL.

Like accidentally deleting the entire Wiki article? 😳 That is one thing keeping me from pressing the “edit” link.

 

[K9KLC]

Like accidentally deleting the entire Wiki article? 😳 That is one thing keeping me from pressing the “edit”

I'd like to think I wouldn't do that but, never know. It seems like it's in sections and if so maybe only delete one part??

 

[AK9R]

The Wiki software keeps a revision history. If you inadvertently delete something, I can restore the previous version.

 

[K9KLC]

The Wiki software keeps a revision history. If you inadvertently delete something, I can restore the previous version.

Perfect. Thanks for the update.