robbinsj2
Member
A couple weeks ago I did a fresh install of Unitrunker, then manually copied over the data file from a prior install which had otherwise been completely removed.
I monitor two EDACS systems -- Middlesex County NJ and South Brunswick NJ. Both are 800MHz but are not related in any way. I'm monitoring with a Pro-197 and the USB cable, no voice following. I move the data file between a desktop and a laptop (paired with a Pro-106) which I use for trunk decoding while traveling. On both the 106 and 197, I programmed bogus TGIDs for the trunked systems and I leave the scanner on that TGRP to follow the system without leaving for voice communications on a real talkgroup.
I have long had trouble differentiating the systems in the data files. Back in the days of Etrunk (with a tapped scanner into the sound card) I simply had separate installs for each system, which worked well. Unitrunker has not worked as well for me, confusing the systems or some other issue, so years ago I purged South Brunswick from the files and monitoring and focused on Middlesex County and nearby Motorola and P25 systems.
With the fresh install, I gave South Brunswick another try. As new data (frequencies, talkgroups, radio IDs) were populated, I edited them as needed. If I stopped and restarted Unitrunker then it would create a new system but when I edited the control channel frequency, it would revert to the stored South Brunswick system profile as it should.
Alas this has ended; I cannot get Unitrunker to realize that the system it is monitoring is, in fact, South Brunswick. Every time I restart Unitrunker it opens a "Limbo" or "Unknown" system and when I type in the actual control channel frequency, it reverts to an Unknown system it has created. If I delete the Unknown system, it stays on the Limbo system.
I've also tried taking the -197 and clicking through the TSYS object to the active control channel, with the same effect. Except if/when the control channel changes, I would lose the data stream.
Does anyone have any tips?
Question two: Unitrunker has worked very nicely on the Middlesex County system, except it starts a new system whenever the control channel changes to a different LCN (even when the scanner, sitting on the TGRP object, switches properly). From years ago I remember someone mentioning this or a similar problem and the solution was a "lock" option whereby, I think, Unitrunker locked on the system in the data files. I don't see that now, am I missing it or is there another solution?
Thanks,
Jim
I monitor two EDACS systems -- Middlesex County NJ and South Brunswick NJ. Both are 800MHz but are not related in any way. I'm monitoring with a Pro-197 and the USB cable, no voice following. I move the data file between a desktop and a laptop (paired with a Pro-106) which I use for trunk decoding while traveling. On both the 106 and 197, I programmed bogus TGIDs for the trunked systems and I leave the scanner on that TGRP to follow the system without leaving for voice communications on a real talkgroup.
I have long had trouble differentiating the systems in the data files. Back in the days of Etrunk (with a tapped scanner into the sound card) I simply had separate installs for each system, which worked well. Unitrunker has not worked as well for me, confusing the systems or some other issue, so years ago I purged South Brunswick from the files and monitoring and focused on Middlesex County and nearby Motorola and P25 systems.
With the fresh install, I gave South Brunswick another try. As new data (frequencies, talkgroups, radio IDs) were populated, I edited them as needed. If I stopped and restarted Unitrunker then it would create a new system but when I edited the control channel frequency, it would revert to the stored South Brunswick system profile as it should.
Alas this has ended; I cannot get Unitrunker to realize that the system it is monitoring is, in fact, South Brunswick. Every time I restart Unitrunker it opens a "Limbo" or "Unknown" system and when I type in the actual control channel frequency, it reverts to an Unknown system it has created. If I delete the Unknown system, it stays on the Limbo system.
I've also tried taking the -197 and clicking through the TSYS object to the active control channel, with the same effect. Except if/when the control channel changes, I would lose the data stream.
Does anyone have any tips?
Question two: Unitrunker has worked very nicely on the Middlesex County system, except it starts a new system whenever the control channel changes to a different LCN (even when the scanner, sitting on the TGRP object, switches properly). From years ago I remember someone mentioning this or a similar problem and the solution was a "lock" option whereby, I think, Unitrunker locked on the system in the data files. I don't see that now, am I missing it or is there another solution?
Thanks,
Jim