I wish I had more confidence in Uniden's ability to provide ongoing support for these new products. Maybe if the confidence was there, I may be tempted to purchase one (or more) of the new models.
Scanners such as the x96XT and HP-1 had (very) sporadic firmware updates over the course of their life cycle, yet despite these updates, the products still had glaringly obvious software flaws that were overlooked despite numerous pleas from owners.
The recent announcement of a HP1 firmware update, fixing one or two of these 'old' flaws is certainly interesting from a timing perspective. The fact that someone, somewhere was tasked with re-writing some of the HP-1 code while owners of the most recent scanners have been left in the dark for the last four months, is rather odd..
Does the N.A Uniden scanner department have a staff complement of greater that 1?
If you look at UPMans own blog depicting photos of himself de-bugging software on very early, prototype x36HP units, you certainly get the impression that this is not much more than a one man show.
Paul, if you read this, I'm not having a go at you personally
You are obviously a very clever man and have a lot of knowledge and experience tucked away in that cranium of yours. I've got a sneaking suspicion that Uniden scanners wouldn't have existed for the last ten years or so, if it wasn't for the likes of you, so for that Sir, I salute you..
That said, Uniden as a corporation has a responsibility to support it's products and to deliver on promises made. So, IMO Uniden as a Corporation, it is failing miserably!
The first thing that needs to happen, is that Uniden needs to improve it's customer feedback and communication mechanisms. It's great that UPMan has a presence on these forums, but this forum is not the best place for customers to submit product modification requests or complaints. The vast majority of people who buy Uniden scanners don't even come to this forum..
Maybe, Uniden should introduce a feature/modification 'weighting/prioritization' system.
Compile a list of improvements, as suggested by end users and then invite end users get to prioritize which of these features/modifications get worked on first, rather than some unknown engineer in some Uniden back office, deciding what is best for us.
Maybe, if such a system were in place ten years ago, we would now have the ability to do a basic band search incorporating CTCSS and NAC at the same time, instead of only one or the other. It is simple software modifications like this that help you attract and retain customers over your competition (not that there is any at the moment).
Instead, we have a system where there is no formal acknowledgement of customer complaints or product improvement suggestions. We get premature or rushed product releases, unmet promises and even the very occasional firmware update that "improves P25 performance" (what the hell does that even mean? In what way does it improve P25 performance?).
For Christ sakes! These things are not toys! They are $500-$600, high end scanners targeted at enthusiast, business and even Government users.
It would be a very sad day for all of us if the second of these options were chosen, but Uniden really needs to put up, or shut up!