First off, let me state that I am by no means an expert on antennas, I'm just publishing the results related to my own experiences.
After reading a lot of good reviews on the Watson W-889, I decided to bite the bullet and purchase one, hoping that I will see some substantial improvement over my stock ducky. Since Durham Radio seems to be the only place to buy one, I went and picked one up for a hefty $50 (tax included)
Since my main areas of interest are the TPS, Fleetnet 1 & the 800MHz Durham/York/Peel TGRPs, those are the ranges against which I tested the W889. The test was conducted from Durham region, close to the 37WHIT tower
Pros:
Overall, I like it's design, I did find some improvements over the stock stubby, but it's fallen a bit short of my expectations, given it's high price tag...
Is it worth $50?...well, while others would strongly agree that it is, the W889 has not convinced me (yet) - I will fiddle some more with various lengths and locations and will report back
Anyone else have a better experience? Anyone managed to map lengths to frequency ranges?
After reading a lot of good reviews on the Watson W-889, I decided to bite the bullet and purchase one, hoping that I will see some substantial improvement over my stock ducky. Since Durham Radio seems to be the only place to buy one, I went and picked one up for a hefty $50 (tax included)
Since my main areas of interest are the TPS, Fleetnet 1 & the 800MHz Durham/York/Peel TGRPs, those are the ranges against which I tested the W889. The test was conducted from Durham region, close to the 37WHIT tower
Pros:
- compact, 6-16" telescopic
- solid design
- improved signal on 800MHz - gained one full bar on TPS from 50km away, somewhat reduced noise
- Reduced some static on Durham 800MHz
- very minor improvements on UHF 450-470MHz by one bar (intermittent)
- very minor improvements on Aircraft 108-137 MHz by one bar (intermittent)
- No manual or marking as to which elements to use for which range (unlike the Diamond RH795); it's trial & error to figure out what best works - I've noticed that 800MHz is not best achieved at shortest length but with 3 elements extended
- no improvements on Peel & York 800MHz
- no improvements on CB/10m/6m/1.25m
Overall, I like it's design, I did find some improvements over the stock stubby, but it's fallen a bit short of my expectations, given it's high price tag...
Is it worth $50?...well, while others would strongly agree that it is, the W889 has not convinced me (yet) - I will fiddle some more with various lengths and locations and will report back
Anyone else have a better experience? Anyone managed to map lengths to frequency ranges?
Last edited: