WCN (P25) Network and BCD996P2 setup

AA0PB

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 3, 2014
Messages
13
Location
Hillsboro, OR
Howdy, Has anyone got a BCD996P2 to work on the new WCN (P25) Network?

I am in Cornelius and only added the sites that are in my area, and I am still getting a Finding Control Channel message.
I tried the 20dB attenuation setting, and only setting up the WCSO Hillsboro site and the simulcast B site (under different system setups).
I do have an external omni antenna with a splitter to feed 4 scanners.
I don't really want to spend $600+ on a new scanner.
It all worked on the old system, thanks for any input.

Scanner: BCD996P2
Ant: Tram 1410 Scanner 25MHz–1,300MHz VHF/UHF Super Discone Base Antenna
Receiver Multicoupler: MCA204M (active multicoupler) from Stridsberg Eng.
 

ChrisP

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 20, 2002
Messages
1,333
Location
Portland, OR
I'm in Aloha and had little to no luck with my 996P2 on the WCN system.
Driving around town it would be hit or miss on hearing any traffic.
This new system is a different animal that the old Motorola system.
Having an outside antenna makes it somewhat worse as you are picking up more of the simulcast sites that are transmitting on the same frequencies. You might try something small and on the radio itself and see what happens.
I finally broke down and bought an SDS scanner and have no problems.

- Chris
 

tvengr

Well Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
9,308
Location
Baltimore County, MD
I am in Cornelius and only added the sites that are in my area, and I am still getting a Finding Control Channel message.
Are you able to get a control channel using this site?
0 (0)013 (D)WCSO HillsboroWashington851.9125858.3625858.8375859.3625c
I suspect that 859.3625 is not the only control channel capable frequency. Enter all 4 frequencies to be safe.
 

radiotweester

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
410
Location
Oregon
I don't own/use that model, but delete the "WCSO Hillsboro" and from your location Simulcast A or B is what you want. The Hillsboro site is an affiliate only fill in and was just being used for the Jail and Court TGs last time I looked. I can't say if B will be better as it just depends if you have a clear RF path to Bald Peak. Remember that all LE is encrypted, but there's fire, LUT, schools, CWS and a few other users. 73s
edit - *I'd remove the multicoupler and go direct due to insertion loss. What coax are you running, RG8 - LMR400 or larger? While discones are great, you've got 0db gain and a WIDE front end on the scanner. I'd consider an 800 yagi pointed toward a site. Even a used ebay yagi with a couple elements you'll have directional gain.
 
Last edited:

radiotweester

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
410
Location
Oregon
I was curious and went looking for a performance graph on the Stridsberg MCA204M Multicoupler, but only found a test on eham
At best -4db with the splitter and 50' of LMR400 and discone. If you're interested, you might be able to receive PD & FD training on Walnut is being done on Simplex 1-4 FM.

MCA204M Frequency Gain or Loss
25 MHz +1.1 db
50 +0.6
101 +1.6
201 +0.5
301 +1.1
401 +0.9
501 +0.4
601 +0.4
701 -0.2
801 -0.2
901 -1.7
990 MHz -2.8 dB
 
Top