• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

What Antenna should I use?

Status
Not open for further replies.

RC4

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2021
Messages
95
Hello! So my wife and I just got a house on top of a pretty big hill here in Oregon.There is a 70 foot fur tree in our backyard that my wife is allowing me to put an antenna in lol. I’ll be running a Dx 2517 mostly 11meter for local and DX. My antenna Options are A99, Imax, 827, star duster or maco v5/8. What one should I go with? Thank you!!
 

KMG54

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 24, 2011
Messages
1,291
Location
Easley S.C.
I have has very good luck with the Sirio 5/8 ground plane here.Flat 1.3:1 across the band once it is tuned.
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
647
Location
Montebello, CA
While it's certainly possible to tie an antenna up in a tree, it can be a pretty big hassle. You could just mount it on the roof. Many people get a bit overly obssessed with having the antenna super high. I have an A99 that I use for 17-10 meters that is only a few feet above my roof. I talk all up and down the west coast with it and it was easy to put up and maintain. As for the antennas, I'd go for the Maco.
 

RC4

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2021
Messages
95
While it's certainly possible to tie an antenna up in a tree, it can be a pretty big hassle. You could just mount it on the roof. Many people get a bit overly obssessed with having the antenna super high. I have an A99 that I use for 17-10 meters that is only a few feet above my roof. I talk all up and down the west coast with it and it was easy to put up and maintain. As for the antennas, I'd go for the Maco.
Wife doesn’t want anything on the house lol :(
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
647
Location
Montebello, CA
I can understand that. I'm fortunate, my wife leaves me alone as long as I don't mess with her TV. I messed with her TV once when I transmitted on 80 meters and the fit throwing was epic!

Something you might consider that could be a lot easier to work with is a vertical dipole. Simpley make a dipole for 11 meters and pull it up in the tree. The coax can be pulled off to the side just a touch and it will work fine. A dipole, being wire, can get blown around in a moving tree and it won't hurt a thing. I think the hardest part about putting a vertical antenna up in a tree is when the tree moves around it's likely to come loose or get damaged. The wire dipole would prevent that and be easy to manage. If you can get the dipole at about 32 feet it will work really well at that is a quarter wave height for 11 meters.
 
Last edited:

R8000

Very Low Battery
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,017
"my wife is allowing me to put an antenna in"
That's good because if she said no, then I would not allow any more purse or shoe purchases. It's a two way street :)
 

RC4

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2021
Messages
95
"my wife is allowing me to put an antenna in"
That's good because if she said no, then I would not allow any more purse or shoe purchases. It's a two way street :)
Happy wife happy life :)

I had a99 on a 40 foot mast on our old place years ago and during a storm it fell on her 4 runner. Oops 😬
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
647
Location
Montebello, CA
You could, but that would be a Marconi antenna and you'd have to use radials. It would become a PITA. A regular old 1/2 wave dipole for 11 meters is only about 16 1/2 feet long. Just string it up from one end with the coax attached in the middle and direct the coax horitontally away from the wire for a few feet and you're good to go. Much easier to deal with and puts out about 98 percent of the power put into it.
 

RC4

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2021
Messages
95
You could, but that would be a Marconi antenna and you'd have to use radials. It would become a PITA. A regular old 1/2 wave dipole for 11 meters is only about 16 1/2 feet long. Just string it up from one end with the coax attached in the middle and direct the coax horitontally away from the wire for a few feet and you're good to go. Much easier to deal with and puts out about 98 percent of the power put into it.
Thank you all for the input but you’re kind of confusing me now. I just want to buy an antenna out of the 5 I listed and put it up :)
 

merlin

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,116
Location
DN32su
In all of my CB realm, the best omni I ever had up was the AS supermagnum. (M-117)
Probably compares to the Sirio but far better quality.
Atop a 20 foot pole on the roof. Less than 2:1 match across the band, fed with good RG-U coax.
The best beam was HiGain's long boom (long John) 5 element atop a 50 foot tower in the back yard.
Between these, I talked to most states and 20 countries globally.
Going mobile on the roof of my pic-up I went from AS-M125 to K-40 and then
Wilson 1000M. Each improved over the other. The radio was a Barrett 550.
Talked daily to a buddy from Portland to Las Vegas and on the bottom of the Oakland bay bridge, talked to Sydney Au.
Only flaw with the supermag was the coil could only handle 100 watt max.
I fried it pumping 2 KW to it, so rewound the coil with #4 copper wire.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,463
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
In all of my CB realm, the best omni I ever had up was the AS supermagnum. (M-117)
Probably compares to the Sirio but far better quality.
Atop a 20 foot pole on the roof. Less than 2:1 match across the band, fed with good RG-U coax.
The best beam was HiGain's long boom (long John) 5 element atop a 50 foot tower in the back yard.
Between these, I talked to most states and 20 countries globally.
Going mobile on the roof of my pic-up I went from AS-M125 to K-40 and then
Wilson 1000M. Each improved over the other. The radio was a Barrett 550.
Talked daily to a buddy from Portland to Las Vegas and on the bottom of the Oakland bay bridge, talked to Sydney Au.
Only flaw with the supermag was the coil could only handle 100 watt max.
I fried it pumping 2 KW to it, so rewound the coil with #4 copper wire.
The M-117 was a half wave end fed and a Hy-Gain Penetrator works noticeably better. I had both and most of the popular base antennas of the late 60s through late 70s. I don’t remember any omni outperforming the Penetrator.
 

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,413
Location
California
I had an Imax on 40’ of mast I ran up against a 75’ California Redwood. I found a path between the branches. I worked the world on 10m and plenty of 15m action to Japan. Unfortunately, water ingress into the antenna ended that. It may still work today, but almost 10 years in the hot sun before it went next to the tree cooked the fiberglass a bit.
 

merlin

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,116
Location
DN32su
The M-117 was a half wave end fed and a Hy-Gain Penetrator works noticeably better. I had both and most of the popular base antennas of the late 60s through late 70s. I don’t remember any omni outperforming the Penetrator.
Well, my M-117 was 21+ foot base loaded with 4radials and those round corona loops at the tip.
That makes 5/8 wave. would it out perform a penetrator ? I don't know but it will match it
I would out perform the starduster, maybe not much, but talking results.
I did have buddies with super penetrator so I certainly can't knock it.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,463
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Well, my M-117 was 21+ foot base loaded with 4radials and those round corona loops at the tip.
That makes 5/8 wave. would it out perform a penetrator ? I don't know but it will match it
I would out perform the starduster, maybe not much, but talking results.
I did have buddies with super penetrator so I certainly can't knock it.
Well, all the advertising for the A/S M117 Super Magnum CB antenna say it’s 1/2 wavelength. I had one and it doesn’t hold a candle to the original Hy-Gain Penetrator 500. That’s why I still use a Penetrator to this day.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top