What do inductors do on antennas?

Status
Not open for further replies.

AgentCOPP1

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
296
So here's another question that I need answering. What do the inductors you see on a lot of antennas do? Almost all mobile antennas have one or two inductors on them, so I was just wondering how they contributed to the performance of the antenna.
 

LtDoc

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
2,145
Location
Oklahoma
It depends on the shpae of the coil to some extent, some of those coils are to provide a delay in the 'signal' going to the part of the antenna past that coil. In that case they are phasing devices. Just a plain old coil of wire made into a coil is usually a 'loading' coil, it adds inductive reactance to the antenna to make it seem 'electrically longer. A straight length of wire/antenna has a certain amount of inductive reactance 'in' it. By coiling that wire up into a smaller shape/volume, you shorten the antenna a bit.
That's certainly not 'fact', or scientifically expressed correctly, but it gives you a rough idea of what a coil does. No, if you straighten that coil of wire out into a straight section it isn't going to be the same amount of 'inductive reactance' as the amount the antenna is shortened, don't make that mistake about it. It's more complicated than that. The right amount of inductive reactance combined with the right amount of capacitive reactance gives you resonance, which is what you want with an antenna.
Confused yet? It ain't simple so don't feel bad...
- 'Doc
 

n5ims

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
3,993
The "coils" may also be more than just a coil, but actually one or more coils along with one or more capacitors making up a tuned circuit that's designed to either pass or not pass some frequencies. This would be used on multi-band antennas to allow the some or all of the length to be used on some bands while other bands only use part of the antenna's length.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,077
Location
Central Indiana
Let's start with a simple example. Take a look at the Larsen NMO 2/70 (either the chrome one with the closed coil or the black one with the open coil). This antenna is a half wave on 2m and a co-linear 5/8 over 5/8 wave on 440 MHz. Because an end-fed 5/8 wave antenna does not have a 50 ohm feedpoint impedance, a coil is necessary to get the impedance where it needs to be. The coil in the middle of that antenna is doing the feedpoint matching for the upper 5/8 wave element on 440. On 2m, that coil is transparent to the RF so the entire length of the antenna radiates as a half-wave antenna.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,706
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Usually the coil between 1/2 wave or 5/8 wave stacked collinear elements is a 1/4 wavelength long (90 deg of delay or phase shift) to place the top and bottom element in phase so their patterns will combine and provide gain at the horizon. Without this the antenna would simply be X/2, X/4 or X/8 wavelengths long and produce gain lobes or nulls in unwanted directions.

The coil or network at the bottom would be for matching the entire whip and could be a simple series inductor, tapped inductor with ground connection, shunt inductor or some combination with capacitor, etc, and the base of a multiband antenna could be quite complex.

The design goal for a dual or multiband collinear antenna is not only to provide gain by properly combining vertical elements but to also make sure the collinear elements with phasing coil(s) add up to some useable resonant length on lower bands. The coil in the whip of a Larsen NMO 2/70 is not transparent on 2m and it ends up shortening the physical length of the whip on 2m.
prcguy


Let's start with a simple example. Take a look at the Larsen NMO 2/70 (either the chrome one with the closed coil or the black one with the open coil). This antenna is a half wave on 2m and a co-linear 5/8 over 5/8 wave on 440 MHz. Because an end-fed 5/8 wave antenna does not have a 50 ohm feedpoint impedance, a coil is necessary to get the impedance where it needs to be. The coil in the middle of that antenna is doing the feedpoint matching for the upper 5/8 wave element on 440. On 2m, that coil is transparent to the RF so the entire length of the antenna radiates as a half-wave antenna.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,077
Location
Central Indiana
Thanks, I completely spaced the phasing issue.
 

ab3a

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Messages
347
Location
Lisbon MD
So here's another question that I need answering. What do the inductors you see on a lot of antennas do? Almost all mobile antennas have one or two inductors on them, so I was just wondering how they contributed to the performance of the antenna.

On lower bands, particularly HF, these inductors are actually called loading coils. Basically, the wavelength is long enough that a full size 1/4 wave or 5/8 wave vertical would be impractical. The loading coil is what makes up the difference. It enables you to use a shorter antenna. HOWEVER, there are some issues to be aware of:

First, the point where the antenna attaches to the coaxial cable is a current node. Even very small resistances can cause significant losses. Bond the coax to the antenna and to the vehicle with care and seal it up so that dirt and corrosion can not take hold.

Second, the coil usually sees significant current, so coil Q matters. The greater the Q and lower resistance you can get from the coil, the better off your antenna performance will be. This is why you see those ridiculous looking bug-catcher antennas on many ham vehicles. They do indeed look ridiculous, but because of the Q, they work surprisingly well. On some antennas, people have learned to put the loading coil up as high as possible to keep it away from the current node at the base. This improves performance and durability a little, but it does get rather ridiculous mechanically.

Basically, unless you're designing an antenna for 40 or 80 meters, there usually isn't much to be gained by putting the loading coil in such a precarious position.

Third, this does limit your bandwidth compared to a full sized antenna. Those who claim that you can use a shortened antenna with wide bandwidth are usually selling a lossy antenna. You will get the wide band SWR match, but it won't radiate well. You'll have a dummy load that looks like an antenna.

Clearly this advice becomes more and more extreme as you go lower in to the HF bands. The practical limit is on 75/80 meters. Anything below that is mostly a waste of time, unless you have a very long antenna stick on a boat. On 10 Meters, this issue isn't particularly critical because the loading coil isn't making up for that much of the wavelength. On Six meters you may be able to get a full 1/4 wave whip, but it will be big. A loading coil won't hurt too much, so use one if you need it.

In general, for two meters, I suggest a plain quarter wave vertical antenna. It is simple, stupid, and as long as you keep connections clean it will work pretty well. If you have a perfect groundplane, the impedance might be as low as 36 ohms, but you can usually match to that anyway, and your coaxial losses will be minimal.

For 70 cm, some like to use a 5/8 wave vertical. Frankly, it hardly matters. You can buy better coaxial cable to your radio and better connectors and make up for any supposed gain that you might get with a 5/8 wave vertical.

Remember that when going mobile, your primary concerns will be durability, corrosion, and dirt. You'll lose more signal to those problems than you might get with a fancy design. Keep everything well bonded, clean, and simple.

Good Luck!
 

AgentCOPP1

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
296
Thanks for all of the answers! AB3A, yeah I knew a little bit about the loading coils and what they were for, but as for the other uses of inductors, it still seems a little bit mysterious to me. I obviously got my license not too long ago (back in January) but I'm really interested in the physics of the antenna. Some of it just seems so complex haha.

LtDoc, how does inductive reactance make it seem electrically longer? I understand that inductive reactance is just simply resisting changes in current, but I don't know how that applies to making the antenna seem longer.

Plus, this is a little side question I have (so many questions, so little time haha). On the negative part of the waveform of an emitted radio wave, what are the electrons doing? I assume that the positive part of the wave means that electrons are being expelled, so what happens on the negative part?

Bear with me, I'm going to be asking quite a few questions over time. I just discovered this amazing thing called the RadioReference forum and rarely do I have the opportunity to ask so many questions to so many qualified people.

As for what prcguy said... I might be better off not trying to understand what the hell you just said lol.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top