RFI-EMI-GUY
Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2013
- Messages
- 7,039
It was supposed to be a 3 year project!It’s easy to look at the 800 rebanding history when reviewing the rebanding news stories updates.
It was supposed to be a 3 year project!It’s easy to look at the 800 rebanding history when reviewing the rebanding news stories updates.
I agree that TV (no longer) needs all that space, but I think most of this spectrum they "reclaimed" is not being used to its potential.
Don't confuse channels with frequencies in the digital era. One transmitter can provide many digital channels. ATSC 1.0 did not work well with VHF. ATSC 3.0, which is not compatible, should work better. But adding VHF only adds 12 physical channels.TV needs more UHF channels than is now allowed, as there is too much overlap in populated areas. This really causes issues for those in the fringe of markets. VHF is all but empty, but most antennas marketed these days do not cover VHF, or at least VHF-low.
I was using channels like the FCC does, as describing the RF allocations. Using only the UHF does not provide enough RF real estate, when markets are near one another. (The number of streams per RF channel is irrelevant.)Don't confuse channels with frequencies in the digital era. One transmitter can provide many digital channels. ATSC 1.0 did not work well with VHF. ATSC 3.0, which is not compatible, should work better. But adding VHF only adds 12 physical channels.
Projects NEVER finish on time. Especially when the government is involvedIt was supposed to be a 3 year project!
The FCC is not using channels like they used to. Have you paid attention to TV markets where ATSC 1.0 and ATSC 3.0 are "operational" side-by-side? The whole repack took into consideration: digital does not need the guard-band analog did, Each transmitter output can contain multiple "channels", Congress would love to sell $pectrum for more play money.I was using channels like the FCC does, as describing the RF allocations. Using only the UHF does not provide enough RF real estate, when markets are near one another. (The number of streams per RF channel is irrelevant.)
They are not using 860-869 MHz. Yeah this discussion was not about modulation type, just physical frequency usage.It’s only a matter of time before this thread starts discussing FM broadcast radio Hybrid Digital broadcasting standards 😀
The FCC is not using channels like they used to. Have you paid attention to TV markets where ATSC 1.0 and ATSC 3.0 are "operational" side-by-side? The whole repack took into consideration: digital does not need the guard-band analog did, Each transmitter output can contain multiple "channels", Congress would love to sell $pectrum for more play money.
They are not using 860-869 MHz. Yeah this discussion was not about modulation type, just physical frequency usage.