What is more important, polarization or resonance ?

kellogs

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2023
Messages
14
Due to fabrication constraints i can only make the antenna either resonant or circular polarized, not both.


- ISM band
- normal mode helical antenna
- used inside a vehicle cabin
- transmitter inside the engine bay


No idea about transmitter polarization, but it will output a very weak signal through a similar antenna - i.e. very small for the frequency.


Given the narrow bandwidth the NMHA has and the likely multi-path incoming waves are going to acquire, I am thinking it will be more important to have it (naturally) resonate for greater sensitivity rather than aim for circular polarization so as to pick up any incoming polarization.
I expect that any sort of polarization the transmitter might put out will reach the receiving antenna in enough polarization modes that the antenna, elliptical polarized, will pick it up anyway.


Is my thinking sound ?
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,806
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
With all things equal there will be a 3dD loss going from linear to circular polarity as in a 0dBiC gain circular polarity transmitting to a 0dBi linear polarity receive antenna. However a circular pol antenna transmitting to a circular pol antenna will have less multipath problems because the polarity will reverse on the first bounce and mostly cancel out at the receive antenna.

Only your doctor can say if your thinking is sound.
 
Top