As posted above, of the federal channels that you monitor, what percentage are VHF and what percentage are UHF? For me, it seems like Federal UHF is way down. So, maybe it would be 95% VHF and 5 % UHF.
What programs have written are they freeware or shareware and i do agree vhf would be a better chance to listen federal communicationsVHF is 95% and UHF is 5%. The VHF might even be higher, I'm just guessing. Most of my programs are written to cover the rural areas of California, Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico. Probably 90% of my federal programming is for the natural resource/public land/fire management agencies. Those agencies use VHF and sometimes UHF for links only. Most of the federal UHF frequencies I've included in my programs are used for uplink/downlink purposes. I like to know the link frequencies as they can greatly enhance listening.
The UHF frequencies seem to be used more in urban areas and in the east. I've rarely traveled to the east and stay away from urban areas as much as possible. When I do visit I find myself so busy listening to nearby federal land management agencies and fire departments that I don't listen to agencies such as the DEA and others who use UHF in metro areas. As a result I don't enter their frequencies in my programs. If I lived in an urban area I would use additional scanners for federal UHF monitoring and devote some time to doing so on a regular basis.
Some of the urban programs I've written are close to filling up the memory capacity of my PSR-600/500 radios.
What programs have written are they freeware or shareware and i do agree vhf would be a better chance to listen federal communications
Sent from my LG-H631 using Tapatalk
What programs have written are they freeware or shareware and i do agree vhf would be a better chance to listen federal communications
Sent from my LG-H631 using Tapatalk