• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

what the diff.

Status
Not open for further replies.

LarrySC

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2001
Messages
2,091
Location
Greenville, SC
Most popular types of coax used for transmitting comes in dif levels of quality. The higher quality, the lower loss factor and the higher cost. The bottom line is always the dollar.
 

gcgrotz

Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
2,091
Location
Charlottesville
Teflon cables, size being equal, don't have a big loss difference. They do handle more power and are high temp resistant. Also flame proof for use in suspended ceilings and elevator shafts for instance. They are also usually double shielded.

For scanner recption, don't waste money on teflon (unless you've got a real deal on some) but get better quality like LMR400 or 9913 and good quality connectors.

RG8x works great at HF below 30 MHz, or if your feedline is short <30-40ft at VHF/UHF. At 800, it gets lossy and type N connectors for it are not readily available and PL259 types are not good at 800. Otherwise, 8x is easier to work with than the larger types.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top