I have a BCD536HP and BCD996P2 the 996 is 20 better on the RSSI than the 536 and I read an article saying that less RSSI is the more sensitive scanner, I like both scanners I'm using one mostly for VHF, which one would be more sensitive for VHF?
Which article did you read?I have a BCD536HP and BCD996P2 the 996 is 20 better on the RSSI than the 536 and I read an article saying that less RSSI is the more sensitive scanner, I like both scanners I'm using one mostly for VHF, which one would be more sensitive for VHF?
Which article did you read?
www.marinediesel.co.in
Ok. RSSI and sensitivity aren’t the same thing so you know.The Sensitivity in a Radio Scanner is designed to measure the signal strength of a radio station. It is measured in microvolts (uV). A smaller number indicates a more sensitive receiver since less signal strength is needed to hear the station. Sensitivity is primarily of importance in rural areas or when listening to weather forecasts on the radio.![]()
Radio Scanners: 10 Powerful Benefits Of Using Radio Scanners
Discover 10 powerful benefits of using radio scanners! Stay informed in emergencies, weather forecasts & more. Enhance your communication experience now!www.marinediesel.co.in
I wasn't sure, so the 996P2 be better for VHFOk. RSSI and sensitivity aren’t the same thing so you know.
Whichever one works best for what you need. Have you ever made a decision before you discovered Radio Reference?Which would be better for VHF between 996p2 and 536hp
I noticed that the 996 signal strength is 20 more than the 536Whichever one works best for what you need. Have you ever made a decision before you discovered Radio Reference?
Ok..then you answered your own question for your environment. My SDS100 and SDS200 has outperformed any scanner I've ever owned, so there you have another opinion.I noticed that the 996 signal strength is 20 more than the 536
So you already own both scanners? Just curious how you are measuring “signal strength”.I noticed that the 996 signal strength is 20 more than the 536
Yes have both, Proscan history logging RSSISo you already own both scanners? Just curious how you are measuring “signal strength
Yes and measuring with ProscanSo you already own both scanners? Just curious how you are measuring “signal strength”.
Cool. Are they using the same antenna? If not then signal strength can vary wildly.Yes have both, Proscan history logging RSSI
Yes been switching between the twoCool. Are they using the same antenna? If not then signal strength can vary wildly.
Just noticed you said a difference of 20. That would be in the tenths of a dB range, way below what you can hear. Parts tolerances could easily account for that. I’d move on and not focus on such a minuscule difference.
Analog or digital?Which would be better for VHF between 996p2 and 536hp
On VHF?My SDS100 and SDS200 has outperformed any scanner I've ever owned, so there you have another opinion.
Yes analogOn VHF?