Which Local Agencies Public Safety Cannot Be Monitored?

Status
Not open for further replies.

zerg90

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston mA
Which local and state public safety agencies cannot be monitored at this time?

Philadelphia PA FD fireground channels - encrypted

Orange County CA law enforcement agencies - encrypted

Edison Twp NJ PD - encrypted

Boston MA PD has 1 encrypted channel

Mass State Radio techs might have 1 encrypted talkgroup

Phoenix AZ PD - new chase channels are encrypted

Duval County FL law enforcement has recently gone encrypted

?Toronto Canada ambulance to hospital channels - encrypted - or is it Calgary Canada?

Lancaster County PA OpenSky

Pennsylvania Statewide OpenSky TRS

?EDACS ProVoice systems?

Motorola ASTRO VSELP - Cleveland Ohio and Memphis TN

Plus assorted other law enforcement agencies that encypt their SWAT channels or dispatch channels on a fulltime or parttime basis?

Lexington MA PD - parttime encryption of dispatch channel.

More? Corrections?

Peter S - Boston MA
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
15,140
Reaction score
1,963
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Warren County, MS- Astro VSELP
MS DOC EDACS PV
Most of Lexington County, SC Encrypted on the Palmetto 800
at least three Counties in MS running EDACS PV
MS Beau. Narc. Mostly encrypted these days
 

musicman476

RR DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Mar 12, 2001
Messages
383
Reaction score
20
Location
McKinney, Texas
Don't forget Pro Voice systems like San Antonio, Texas, which also includes use of ESK, and DFW Airport Public Safety.
Auroa, Colorado is Pro Voice, too. Lakewood, CO is EDACS AEGIS, which is also unmonitorable, I think.

Two more OpenSky systems include Cumberland County PA, and New York's new statewide system.

Dustin
 

BobWeb

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Messages
434
Reaction score
0
Location
Thornton, CO
musicman476 said:
Lakewood, CO is EDACS AEGIS, which is also unmonitorable, I think.
Dustin

Lakewood is monitorable. They changed their initial setup since it caused so many problems.
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,901
Reaction score
2,587
Location
Bowie, Md.
Pennsylvania's Open Sky system is way over budget and several years late. It's never been on the air, except in the Harrisburg area. In fact, there have been calls for inquiries and new bids (adding to the budget overage). It's a real mess, and personally I doubt it's ever going to go statewide. The poor residents are paying for this debacle with their tax dollars. :evil:

There's been numerous posts on Strong Signals and some on Phillyscanner about this.

Also I read somewhere that Lancaster might be abandoning their open sky system for Motorola; not sure of the source, and I'm also not quite sure about whether that was Lancaster city or county. But hopefully for the scannists in the area, it's the beginning of a trend. :wink:

73s Mike
 

K2KOH

Silent Key
Joined
Jul 30, 2001
Messages
2,767
Reaction score
159
Location
Putnam County, NY
M/A Com strikes again!! Now maybe NYS will look into getting a Motorola system for their statewide network. They should look at the models around the northeast...New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts...haven't heard any complaints about the Connecticut statewide system, but I hear a lot of complaints about M/A Com systems... :twisted:
 

Archie

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2003
Messages
268
Reaction score
21
Location
Yonkers, NY
REPLY

Connecticut:

Greenwich Police have optional encrytion

Milford Police have full time encryption

New York:

Buffalo Police have two encrypted channels

New Jersey

Hoboken Police have one optional encrypted channel on new 800 system
 

Chris-M

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
258
Reaction score
0
@%$*

Yes it sux seeing more and more systems encrypting. I love listening, always have the scanner running in the room even though I may not be paying attention to everything.

When I hear of a Public Safety system using encryption, espcecially when it's a fire department system, I feel cheated. My tax dollars at work buying big money radios so I can't listen in and enjoy my hobby. :?
Sure they could encrypt a Tactical channel or two and switch to it when they need to talk about something in a secure channel.
Thank you 'Homeland Security'. :roll:

But when it comes to my cordless phone, I must have some technology in mine since I know how easy it is to eavesdrop with a plain FM phone on 49mhz, etc. Digital Spread Spectrum (DSS) is what I've been buying for years now. Sure it can be monitored but your neighbor won't likely have the equipment to do it!

Well I guess time will tell how this is going to pan out. I remember feeling like the scanning hobby would never be the same when 800mhz truning systems started popping up everywhere. But, encryption is the end-all move. There will never be a scanner marketed that can break any kind of encryption.

APCO25 is one thing. It makes a lot of scanners somewhat obsolete. But encryption is the final blow to the hobby.

Just my 2 bits worth. 8)
 

Pro-95

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2004
Messages
798
Reaction score
0
Location
Washoe Valley Nevada
AEMTKieran said:
M/A Com strikes again!!
Nevada Shared Radio System, statewide EDACS, oops, nevermind even they can't listen to it since it's not working after pumping 10 million dollars into it! :evil:

Some sites are coming online but the Troopers carry cell phones to call in plates in areas where there is substainial "dead spots" due to lack of coverage and 800Mhz.
 

zerg90

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston mA
Thanks for all the replies. I am storing the info in a file at www.yahoogroups.com/group/sonofrcma

If anyone wants to pretty up the info, and post it on a website somewhere - be my guest.

We can add North Reading PD in Massachusetts to the list - I am told that they are often encrypted.

Can anyone confirm that LAPD detective channels are encrypted? How about the NYPD Intelligence Channel and the NYPD Comm Division Channel?

Any other encrypted local or state agencies out there? How about agencies that use voice inversion scrambling?

Peter S
 

Archie

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2003
Messages
268
Reaction score
21
Location
Yonkers, NY
REPLY

Here's three Westchester County, NY villages using occasional speech inversion:

Croton
Hastings on Hudson
Pleasantville
 

N4DES

Retired 0598 Czar ÆS Ø
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,617
Reaction score
603
Location
South FL
Some LE agencies that utilize Palm Beach County's 813a is using DES on a handful of talk-groups.
 

bigreddawg76

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
Dover Twsp PD in Ocean County NJ has encryption on all of it's P-25 police channels but it is not on all the time, only when needed.
 

wwhitby

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jan 10, 2003
Messages
1,327
Reaction score
265
Location
Autauga County, Alabama
The City of Montgomery Alabama:

All of the FD is ProVoice
All of the PD is ProVoice, except for the analog dispatch channel and Riverwalk Stadium talkgroup
Housing Authority Police is ProVoice digital

Using T4Win, i've found another agency that is all ProVoice digital on 3 or 4 talkgroups, but they don't interact with the MPD. Hmmmm....

Others in Alabama that aren't monitorable:

Alabama EMA - SouthernLinc
Auburn University at Montgomery PD - SouthernLinc
Alabama State DOT - SouthernLinc (although they still use some VHF.)

Quite a few local PDs, FDs, SOs and the Alabama State Department of Public Safety use SouthernLinc or NEXTEL to augment their VHF or UHF comms.

Warren
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top