mkewman
Member
IMO the mac is easier to program with, why does everyone go for the PC?
it leaves us appleheads in the rain.
mkewman said:IMO the mac is easier to program with, why does everyone go for the PC?
it leaves us appleheads in the rain.
Only if you own a copy of the bible. (For those who've never programmed a Mac, Apple publishes, or used to publish [I haven't programmed anything for the Mac since the Mac 128] a series of volumes with "rules" you have to follow if you want your program to work through changes in OS versions.)mkewman said:IMO the mac is easier to program with
Most people, when they want or need a computer, buy a PC. So most people, when they write an application, write it on a PC so, naturally, they write it to run on a PC.why does everyone go for the PC?
PCs are for people who need computers. Macs are, as the Apple commercials used to say, for the rest of you.it leaves us appleheads in the rain.
http://www.dbnjug.org.za/forum/mac.swfepbernstein said:Because they do what they advertise and don't crash?
N_Jay said:http://www.dbnjug.org.za/forum/mac.swf
Caution, some profanity
Jay said:I've not looked at Macs since the days of the classic Macintosh. Do they even have an available RS232 port? I was under the impression that Apple used their own connectors for everything.
I have a Windows machine that, aside from reboots for installations and other changes that I've initiated, has been running since January without a crash. It was running from November to January without a crash, when I turned it off to move it from my store to my house. It was built in November.epbernstein said:Because they do what they advertise and don't crash?
Al42 said:I have a Windows machine that, aside from reboots for installations and other changes that I've initiated, has been running since January without a crash. It was running from November to January without a crash, when I turned it off to move it from my store to my house. It was built in November.
What was that about Windows crashing?
I will admit ... it's easier to write buggy software for Windows than it is for the Mac. But I can write an app that'll crash a Mac very easily.epbernstein said:All I can go by is that for every positive Windows comment I've heard, I've heard at least 10 horror stories. And for every negative Mac comment I've heard, I've heard at least 10 positive comments.
Jay said:I think the ultimate answer to the question posed by this thread is that there isn't sufficient demand for control/programming software for the Mac. However, with the programming code sets available for all the Uniden models (and, presumably, the GRE models, though I haven't owned a GRE unit in years), it wouldn't be that hard for a person with some Mac programming know-how to slap something together.
Frankly, to me it's like asking why you can't get a PAL based TV/DVD/etc for the US market (electrical system, etc). There are so few people who could benefit from that, nobody has bothered to market such a beast.
epbernstein said:Because they do what they advertise and don't crash?