why is there no scanner software for the mac?

Status
Not open for further replies.

wesct

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
764
Reaction score
3
Location
Connecticut
mkewman said:
IMO the mac is easier to program with, why does everyone go for the PC?

:( it leaves us appleheads in the rain.

you should be able to run virtual pc on your mac and make almost any pc program work.

wesct
 

MacombMonitor

Member
Joined
May 18, 2005
Messages
3,551
Reaction score
4
Many, if not most scanner users are technical people. Many, if not most MAC users are not technical people. If MAC's are truly easier to program on, have you considered trying to write a scanner program yourself? There actually are some scanner programs that run on the MAC platform. What specifically are you looking for?
 

Al42

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
3,457
Reaction score
0
Location
Long Island, NY, USA
mkewman said:
IMO the mac is easier to program with
Only if you own a copy of the bible. (For those who've never programmed a Mac, Apple publishes, or used to publish [I haven't programmed anything for the Mac since the Mac 128] a series of volumes with "rules" you have to follow if you want your program to work through changes in OS versions.)

But it's no "easier" to program for the Mac - PCs use Windows, so programming is still pretty much drag-and-drop, for either computer.
why does everyone go for the PC?
Most people, when they want or need a computer, buy a PC. So most people, when they write an application, write it on a PC so, naturally, they write it to run on a PC.

:( it leaves us appleheads in the rain.
PCs are for people who need computers. Macs are, as the Apple commercials used to say, for the rest of you.
 

Jay911

Silent Key (April 15th, 2023)
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
9,378
Reaction score
380
Location
Bragg Creek, Alberta
I've not looked at Macs since the days of the classic Macintosh. Do they even have an available RS232 port? I was under the impression that Apple used their own connectors for everything.
 

JPasquini

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Location
Upstate New York
I'm a Mac user too (OS 10.2 - a little out of rev, but it works well for me). Nonetheless, my main systems are still Windows machines (a mixture of Intel and AMD). In fact, I have one Windows system dedicated to use in the shack for amateur radio and scanner operations. It's running 9 serial ports (PCI based expansion card along with the one built in COM port).

Radio usage was not one of my reasons for buying the iMac. OS X was :)

[As an aside, my Mac interest has faded as I've since migrated my *nux operations over to Fedora.]
 

Al42

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
3,457
Reaction score
0
Location
Long Island, NY, USA
epbernstein said:
Because they do what they advertise and don't crash?
I have a Windows machine that, aside from reboots for installations and other changes that I've initiated, has been running since January without a crash. It was running from November to January without a crash, when I turned it off to move it from my store to my house. It was built in November.

What was that about Windows crashing?
 

epbernstein

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
301
Reaction score
0
Location
Boulder, CO
Al42 said:
I have a Windows machine that, aside from reboots for installations and other changes that I've initiated, has been running since January without a crash. It was running from November to January without a crash, when I turned it off to move it from my store to my house. It was built in November.

What was that about Windows crashing?

All I can go by is that for every positive Windows comment I've heard, I've heard at least 10 horror stories. And for every negative Mac comment I've heard, I've heard at least 10 positive comments.

Your mileage may (and obviously does) vary.

I must say, though, that XP Professional runs better than any previous Windows OS, even when it's running on Virtual PC...
 

CoryCooper

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Location
Salem, NH
I am running ARC250 V1.12-PRO in Virtual PC 7.0.2 (Win XP Pro SP2) with my Uniden BC796D connected via a Radio Shack USB-to-Serial Port adapter (26-183). It works flawlessly. Dual 2GHz G5 w/4GB RAM running Mac OS X 10.4.2.

C
 

Al42

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2005
Messages
3,457
Reaction score
0
Location
Long Island, NY, USA
epbernstein said:
All I can go by is that for every positive Windows comment I've heard, I've heard at least 10 horror stories. And for every negative Mac comment I've heard, I've heard at least 10 positive comments.
I will admit ... it's easier to write buggy software for Windows than it is for the Mac. But I can write an app that'll crash a Mac very easily.
 

Jay911

Silent Key (April 15th, 2023)
Joined
Feb 15, 2002
Messages
9,378
Reaction score
380
Location
Bragg Creek, Alberta
I think the ultimate answer to the question posed by this thread is that there isn't sufficient demand for control/programming software for the Mac. However, with the programming code sets available for all the Uniden models (and, presumably, the GRE models, though I haven't owned a GRE unit in years), it wouldn't be that hard for a person with some Mac programming know-how to slap something together.

Frankly, to me it's like asking why you can't get a PAL based TV/DVD/etc for the US market (electrical system, etc). There are so few people who could benefit from that, nobody has bothered to market such a beast.
 

epbernstein

Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
301
Reaction score
0
Location
Boulder, CO
Jay said:
I think the ultimate answer to the question posed by this thread is that there isn't sufficient demand for control/programming software for the Mac. However, with the programming code sets available for all the Uniden models (and, presumably, the GRE models, though I haven't owned a GRE unit in years), it wouldn't be that hard for a person with some Mac programming know-how to slap something together.

Frankly, to me it's like asking why you can't get a PAL based TV/DVD/etc for the US market (electrical system, etc). There are so few people who could benefit from that, nobody has bothered to market such a beast.

And the ultimate solution for us Mac users is to pay a $250 premium to be able to use the UASD or ARC software to program our scanners. Adds a bit to the price, but that's the way it goes, I guess....
 

wa8pyr

Retired and playing radio whenever I want.
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
8,194
Reaction score
5,108
Location
Ohio
epbernstein said:
Because they do what they advertise and don't crash?

Well put...

Tom WA8PYR
Happy Mac owner.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top