Wichita Falls Media Threatens Lawsuit

Status
Not open for further replies.

edwftx

Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2004
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
What I find ironic is that when the city of Wichita Falls moved to the new dispatch center out of the police station they failed or made the complete oversight to move the paging system that activates the emergency outdoor civil defense/tornado sirens and the back up system is located at KFDX-TV 3 where the local hams skywarn net control sets up during severe weather.

I would think the skywarn net would not be in active mode in the case of a train derailment with major chlorine or anhydrous amonia leak and the sirens needed to be sounded.
 

radiolalaland

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
116
Reaction score
0
Apparently they've got it settled now.

They'll now give them a head's up with an email. Gotta love the progress.

http://www.kvia.com/Global/story.asp?S=3168772

WICHITA FALLS, Texas Police and news media in Wichita Falls have reached a deal in their dispute over access to emergency radio transmissions.
The deal calls for city to alert the news organizations of police and fire activity via e-mail.
 

radiolalaland

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
116
Reaction score
0
POLICE CHIEF STANDS HIS GROUND ON SCANNER ISSUE

One week before police are set to cut off news reporters from listening to routine radio traffic, the Police Chief is sticking to his guns. Chief, Dennis Bachman called a news conference this morning to reiterate the plan to encrypt all frequencies for the protection of the officers. Now the Chief says the concern about open frequencies goes beyond the safety of his officers.
http://www.kfdx.com/news/default.asp?mode=shownews&id=8443

---------------

My question is what does Witchita Falls have to hide?

How bad of a town can Witchita Falls really be?
 

radiolalaland

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2004
Messages
116
Reaction score
0
Talk about playing with danger. If I'm reading this correctly.

They move all the dispatch stuff and hide the radio traffic from the public in the times of an emergency.

But Hams have access to the emergency alerting system to the public. And if they wanted, could fail to inform the public in time of an emergency just because they can't hear what the local police are doing?

edwftx said:
What I find ironic is that when the city of Wichita Falls moved to the new dispatch center out of the police station they failed or made the complete oversight to move the paging system that activates the emergency outdoor civil defense/tornado sirens and the back up system is located at KFDX-TV 3 where the local hams skywarn net control sets up during severe weather.

I would think the skywarn net would not be in active mode in the case of a train derailment with major chlorine or anhydrous amonia leak and the sirens needed to be sounded.
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
1,289
Reaction score
39
Location
PNW
What about the trust between the community and the city? This isn't some black-box government project with a hidden budget, it's the local police department for gosh sakes.

Apparently all the citizens of Wichita Falls are criminals and don't deserve to know what their tax dollars are up to because of a few bad apples.

Sending an e-mail to the news organizations from the city during major incidents seems to me a lot like censorship of the media.

(Edit: The population in Wichita Falls is about 104,000. Not exactly a big city.)
 

lschmidt

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
178
Reaction score
0
Location
Logan Iowa
The Pen Is Mightier Than The Sword

The people of Witchita Falls should start a letter writing campaign to the
police chief.He works for them not for himself.
 

Mick

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,540
Reaction score
42
Location
Western U.S.
Reminded me of this:
Open access to police communications is vital

a.. If things progress as planned, pretty soon residents of the Seacoast,
state and region will hear no evil - at least not from their police
scanners.
a.. As we reported on Sunday, police departments all over the state are
switching to a digital radio system that will, as it stands now, prevent the
general public from hearing law enforcement information over the
traditional, commercially manufactured radio scanners. The goal, from the
viewpoint of law enforcement, is to develop an integrated communications
system that will allow police to talk freely with their counterparts in
far-flung locations.

We fully support this move to integrate communications. It is vital in these
post-Sept. 11 days that law enforcement officials be able to get in contact
with each other in the event of a major emergency.

In addition to developing an integrated system, however, the switch to
digital will preclude anyone who is not part of the law enforcement
community - or who has not been given access to its communications - from
tuning into police conversations. While it is important to keep criminals in
the dark concerning police matters, the new system will also pull the plug
on those who either enjoy listening to the activities in the streets of
their communities via their scanners or who need access to this information
for independent oversight purposes.

Conversion to a digital format will deny the public any information that law
enforcement officials do not want to share. It could make law enforcement a
closed community and, in doing so, open the system to abuses.

Police in some Seacoast towns have already curtailed information available
to the public when it involves data secured from the state Department of
Motor Vehicles. A law passed by the state Legislature two years ago sought
to prevent personal information contained in that department's records from
being openly distributed, and some local police departments have used this
law as an excuse not to give out information concerning individuals involved
in motor-vehicle accident, fraud or theft cases.

In a free society, which is what America still professes to be even in the
wake of the terrorist attacks in September, public oversight of public
functions is a necessity. Without that oversight, an agency - any agency,
federal, state or local - can do what it wishes including abuse its powers
by diminishing individual freedoms.

This is particularly true in the area of law enforcement, where agency
powers are extensive and far-reaching. We have already seen the kinds of
abuses law enforcement is capable of in some of the major cities in our
country.

We are not saying we lack trust in our local police departments; they
represent, in many cases, the thin line that separates us from those who
would do us harm. However, it is important that the activities of those
departments be open to public scrutiny so abuses that could stem from an
atmosphere of secrecy do not take place.

We urge the development of digital scanners and, in the meantime, ask local
police departments to make available equipment that can convert digital
transmissions back into voice communications for private, law-abiding
citizens and the press. This equipment should not be supplied free of charge
or to people with criminal histories, but it should be available in order to
assure the public that law enforcement is, indeed, following the laws it is
sworn to uphold.

- Portsmouth Herald
December 13, 2001
http://www.seacoastonline.com/2001news/12_13_e1.htm


oregontreehugger said:
What about the trust between the community and the city? This isn't some black-box government project with a hidden budget, it's the local police department for gosh sakes.

Apparently all the citizens of Wichita Falls are criminals and don't deserve to know what their tax dollars are up to because of a few bad apples.

Sending an e-mail to the news organizations from the city during major incidents seems to me a lot like censorship of the media.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top