Wouxun KG-935H vs. Yaesu FT-60R

308guru

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
12
I’ve been thinking of getting an FT-60 for quite some time now. Not exactly sure why I haven’t done that yet, I think it’s the feeling that I would be buying something antiquated. Yes, I understand they are highly regarded. Every time I pick up my current UV-5R I’m ready to click “buy now”.

I just noticed the new Wouxun KG-935H which seems to check all the boxes. The GMRS version of it has been out for a few years and seems to be well liked. The Ham version was just released.

It’s made in China which sucks, especially compared to the Japan COO for the FT-60. I have plenty of things that are made in China that don’t suck though.

The KG-945H does have “dual receive” which is a feature I do like.

Anyway, does anyone have thoughts on the new KG-945H either by itself or as compared to the FT-60R?

Thanks.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,081
Location
Central Indiana
I think it’s the feeling that I would be buying something antiquated.
I would take an "antiquated" Yaesu FT-60 over just about any handheld from a Chinese brand. The FT-60 has remained on the market for so long because it gets the job done with solid, reliable construction and without a lot of frills.
 

W4AXW

A keeper of the SSB flame
Joined
Jun 30, 2024
Messages
46
The FT-60 has remained on the market for so long because it gets the job done with solid, reliable construction and without a lot of frills.
It's a shame that has to be explained, ain't it? Buy 1 "antiquated" radio that does what is really needed for a long time vs. replacing multiple New and Sparkly. Duh.
 

308guru

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
12
Do either of you have hands on experience with the Woxun? It’s easy to blow of something new without reason.

You running carburetors on your daily driver too?
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,743
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
The FT-60 is a time proven performer, solid dual conversion receiver, super fast band and memory scan, and simple to use and program from the keypad. Will last for 20 years and has superb RX and TX audio. The company backs it with a 3 year parts/labor USA based warranty.

CCRs often have buggy firmware, muffled low transmit audio, and where they really lack is in things like scanning. UV-5Rs typically suffer from poor front end overload, muffled transmit audio which make other people ignore you, and just aren't quality radios. Sure they are cheap but that's where it starts and that's where it ends. One gets what one pays for. Buy once, cry once. One and done. Get an FT-60 if you want a real HAM radio that works. It also makes a pretty good air band receiver. You'll like never need the manual or programming software.
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,743
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
Do either of you have hands on experience with the Woxun? It’s easy to blow of something new without reason.

You running carburetors on your daily driver too?
Yes, they junk. Most CCRs are based on low rent, low cost "walkie talkie on chip" SLICs designed for consumer devices such as FRS radios.
These chips are designed for kiddie toys not tools. Real radios have front end filters. The FT-60 has two ceramic IF filters. That's why they don't go deaf in the presence of out of band RF like CCR turd radios do. They can scan fast and actually stop on active memories or frequencies, and do things like CTCSS/DCS tone search with accuracy thanks to well written firmware.

Nothing wrong with carburetors, they are simple, easy to maintain and foolproof. How many EFI/ECMS even from 1990s vehicles are dead due to bad capacitors. Not like you can trot down to AutoZone and buy a new one for your 1992 Ford Ranger. I do LMR for a living. I know what works and what is trash.
 

AK9R

Lead Wiki Manager and almost an Awesome Moderator
Super Moderator
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
10,081
Location
Central Indiana
Do either of you have hands on experience with the Woxun?
No, I don't. But, I don't need to put hands on it to know that it's built around a radio-on-a-chip design that historically has poor resistance to strong signals on nearby frequencies and the Chinese handhelds historically have poor spurious emission suppression. Maybe this radio is different, but without seeing it on a test bench, it's all speculation. Or, we can avoid the speculation and go with a radio that has been tested and shown to conform with U.S. amateur radio rules as well has the experience gleaned from thousands in the field. Besides, the Wouxun that you referenced has the "0" key in the wrong place--a pet peeve of mine.
It’s easy to blow of something new without reason.
Those of us who have had experience with Chinese handhelds have stated our reasons.
You running carburetors on your daily driver too?
No, but my daily still has a cast-iron block, pushrods, and overhead valves.

Isn't this Wouxun a GMRS HT?
There appears to be two models: Wouxun KG-935H and KG-935G. If they are following the rules, the KG-935H would require FCC Part 95E certification in order to be used on GMRS.
 

308guru

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
12
Thank you all for the replies. I fully understand the FT-60R has a long history and stellar track record. I'm not defending or placing the Woxun as superior in any way, I'm trying to get real world feedback on why I would pick one vs. the other.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,609
Location
United States
I'm not asking about a $29 radio. The KG-935H specifically referenced is $150.

So, CCR for $150, or get the real deal, proven performer, known good, well supported radio for $159?
Seems like a no-brainer to me:
 

308guru

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
12
I continue to see the cheap radios referred to as "radio on a chip".

How is the FT-60 (or other "quality" radios) different? There are no IC's in the good radios?
 

a727469

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2003
Messages
569
Location
Maine
While I agree with everyone on the ft60r, I would also consider the Alinco below. It also includes dmr, is dual receive and is a great size. It is a few dollars more but worth it. I got mine on sale for about the same price as the radios you are considering. I would forget the
Wouxun. It is not in the same class as either the yaesu or the alinco.

 

308guru

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Messages
12
While I agree with everyone on the ft60r, I would also consider the Alinco below. It also includes dmr, is dual receive and is a great size. It is a few dollars more but worth it. I got mine on sale for about the same price as the radios you are considering. I would forget the
Wouxun. It is not in the same class as either the yaesu or the alinco.

Looks like the 0 on the keypad is in the wrong spot.
 

a727469

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2003
Messages
569
Location
Maine
Yes, true, but not sure how important that is. I, too, have complained about that, but can live with it since most all programming is done through software for me.
 

ladn

Explorer of the Frequency Spectrum
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 25, 2008
Messages
1,479
Location
Southern California and sometimes Owens Valley
How is the FT-60 (or other "quality" radios) different? There are no IC's in the good radios?
All modern radios have IC's.

The "radio on a chip" CCR's are based on a single IC that has most of the radio components and the manufacturer only needs to add relatively few external parts. And therein lies the problem; this design keeps the parts count and assembly costs low, but the manufactures don't add additional filtering and tend to use less than prime quality components.

The FT-60 uses a more conventional and complex design with multiple ICs and well designed filtration with high quality parts. Yaesu also provides USA based customer support and service. I'm not aware of any CCR manufacturers who do the same, but a few vendors like Let's Get Ready, do provide decent support.
 

k6cpo

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
1,386
Location
San Diego, CA
Isn't this Wouxun a GMRS HT?
FT60 is Amateur Radio HT

My experience with Wouxun has been that they are one of the better Chinese radios. I have two Wouxun KGUVA-1 Part 90 radios I used as a train crew volunteer at a tourist railway for several years. They were very reliable and never failed me. They might not be as durable as the FT-60 but with some care, they will last.

The FT-60 was my second HT and I still fall back on it occasionally. It's got a star-shaped crack in the window over the LCD screen where I banged it against something while traveling on Amtrak, but the radio works like new even though it's 13 years old.
 

N4KVE

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
4,279
Location
PALM BEACH, FLORIDA
While I agree with everyone on the ft60r, I would also consider the Alinco below. It also includes dmr, is dual receive and is a great size. It is a few dollars more but worth it. I got mine on sale for about the same price as the radios you are considering. I would forget the
Wouxun. It is not in the same class as either the yaesu or the alinco.

The Alinco is also a chip on a radio. I got one cheap, & programmed it with a code plug from a CCR. No dual conversion receive, but it works pretty good. For $100, I’m not complaining.
 
Top