Hi folks,
Before you cut me down as a tourist coming in and having no idea what he's talking about, please look at this.
For reference: Washington State Patrol Trunking System, Various, Washington - Scanner Frequencies and U.S. Dept. of Justice: Integrated Wireless Network (IWN) Trunking System, Various, Multi-State - Scanner Frequencies
Both have the same WACN and SID.
From my Unitrunker setup, reading from an R820T dongle:
Site 001-064 ValleyCom of DoJ IWN, neighbor sites (note the last two):
Site 002-001 Bellevue of WSP, neighbor sites (note the first eight):
And for what it's worth, the bandplan for Site 002-001 Bellevue.
First things first - both 001-064 and 002-001 show sites in the other RFSS as neighbors. The systems are connected, if not one and the same.
Also, the RFSS 002 sites (the "WSP system") are capable of Phase 2, but are not using it, so the system should not be identified as such in the RRDB. (The only bandplan in the system with phase 2 info is plan 15, and the actual sites uses plan 1, as indicated by the LCN #s in the first two images.)
I haven't submitted this to the DB yet. Please let me know if there's a compelling reason why I shouldn't do so.
Before you cut me down as a tourist coming in and having no idea what he's talking about, please look at this.
For reference: Washington State Patrol Trunking System, Various, Washington - Scanner Frequencies and U.S. Dept. of Justice: Integrated Wireless Network (IWN) Trunking System, Various, Multi-State - Scanner Frequencies
Both have the same WACN and SID.
From my Unitrunker setup, reading from an R820T dongle:
Site 001-064 ValleyCom of DoJ IWN, neighbor sites (note the last two):
Site 002-001 Bellevue of WSP, neighbor sites (note the first eight):
And for what it's worth, the bandplan for Site 002-001 Bellevue.
First things first - both 001-064 and 002-001 show sites in the other RFSS as neighbors. The systems are connected, if not one and the same.
Also, the RFSS 002 sites (the "WSP system") are capable of Phase 2, but are not using it, so the system should not be identified as such in the RRDB. (The only bandplan in the system with phase 2 info is plan 15, and the actual sites uses plan 1, as indicated by the LCN #s in the first two images.)
I haven't submitted this to the DB yet. Please let me know if there's a compelling reason why I shouldn't do so.