XG-100 Feature Encryption String - Reverse Engineering

[W4UO]

I know there was an old thread from 2009 that is closed . Back then these models were definitely in Harris's revenue stream. Now I believe that should not be an issue as these radios have been EOL for some time now. Any opinions on this ?

Feature Encryption String - Reverse Engineering

Hot topic I know but i figured id stir the pot a little. Trying to figure out just how these feature encryption strings A: Relate to the 40+ "feature codes" we all use, B: How the string is derived from the ESN, and C: If there is some other 3rd "key" needed to have it all make sense. Over at...

forums.radioreference.com

 

[prcguy]

I believe the XG-100M is still supported to some extent like purchasing feature upgrades. No matter what the age of the radio or if it’s out of production the software/firmware should have some copyright protection. My opinion is unless the manufacturer states it’s a free for all on a particular model and washes their hands of it you probably don’t want to advertise that your hacking their product.

 

[KevinC]

I believe the XG-100M is still supported to some extent like purchasing feature upgrades. No matter what the age of the radio or if it’s out of production the software/firmware should have some copyright protection. My opinion is unless the manufacturer states it’s a free for all on a particular model and washes their hands of it you probably don’t want to advertise that your hacking their product.

I would agree. And the below post still applies...

I don't think we really need a discussion on reverse engineering the feature string to add new features that you haven't paid for.

Might want to move the discussion over to Austech.

Closing.