• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

XPR6300 - Enhanced encryption?

Status
Not open for further replies.

RRR

OFFLINE
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
1,970
Location
USA
Hello, is an XPR6300 (portable) capable of enhanced encryption? Basic and none are my only options.

Am I doing something wrong?
 

zsauve

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
167
Location
Oak Creek, WI
XPR-6300's come standard with enhanced encryption. Since the XPR-6300's were part of the very 1st generation of TRBO radios that Motorola produced, there is a chance that you are running an older version of the firmware before enhanced encryption was introduced. Check your firmware versions, the current firmware version for the XPR-6300 is version 1.12.17 and codeplug version 13.02.03
 

IMPRES2

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2014
Messages
156
Also make sure your CPS is set to “Expert” view instead of “Basic.” The basic view omits several modifiable fields, RAS included. Most XPR 4K and 6K will have both of those features available after a firmware update to the latest 01.12.17 (there will never be anymore releases for this generation so why skip the upgrade?). XPR 6100’s are the only XPR that still require an entitlement to unlock digital operation and the associated features of a digital radio such as RAS and Privacy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RRR

IMPRES2

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2014
Messages
156
RAS.... I absolutely hate RAS.
Restricted Access to System is extremely useful when customer’s enter into legally binding term contracts with vendors; or when there is a stand-alone rental system owned by vendor A in vendors B territory; or when the system owner says F-all and adds EDP with RAS because they want the highest level of intrusion protection they can get.

Why would you hate such a useful system accessory?
 

RRR

OFFLINE
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
1,970
Location
USA
I understand exactly what it is for, but I have also noticed when the headers are screwed with (even with enc) that users have more "bonks" and the coverage degrades more on the edges, because the headers aren't decoded properly, where when before RAS and/or ENC was added, those issues weren't present.
 

IMPRES2

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2014
Messages
156
I understand exactly what it is for, but I have also noticed when the headers are screwed with (even with enc) that users have more "bonks" and the coverage degrades more on the edges, because the headers aren't decoded properly, where when before RAS and/or ENC was added, those issues weren't present.
Now you’re adding more possibilities of true-fault. I have numerous LCP and Connect Plus systems deployed in both the 900 and 450 range running EDP and RAS (RAS on the LCP). All the systems I manage are running R02.08.05.0004 or newer for subscribers and repeaters; I have witnessed zero issues with degradation of service between clear and encrypted talkgroups. Digital is natively a hit-or-completely miss deal with coverage borders. Analog had that soft fade of gradual degradation where as Digital is jus—

Yeah, It all depends on system design and configuration.
 

RRR

OFFLINE
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
1,970
Location
USA
I understand what you are saying, but when there are additions and scrambling of the headers in a digitally transmitted signal, they are more vulnerable to distortion when the signal is not optimal.

I am familiar with several DMR/Trbo systems that have suffered voice degradation when using Enhanced ENC, and with loss of range when RAS was added. Maybe in a saturated, multi site area, you don't notice it, but in a rural environment, it is quite noticeable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top