Is 800mHz really the solution for a diverse state such as PA. I'm happy to see that (maybe) York County saw it wasn't the answer for them (or perhaps they justcouldn't get the frequency assignments), but regardless, a county with primarly rolling hills and valleys, I can't imagine how many sites would be required to sustain coverage on the 800mHz spectrum. Save those (sparcly remaining) frequencies for the big cities that truely need them. And does a state like PA really need a statewide radio network like proposed? Is the real answer maybe to improve the existing system. Isn't the VHF highband really the optimal choice for a state such as PA? I think about Harford County, MD, which has similar topography as York County. They recently upgraded from a seven-channel UHF repeater network to an 10-channel 800mHz network. Often talked about is the lack of existing replacment parts for their current UHF infrastructure. Maybe the more appropriate choice would have been to upgrade their existing system. MDC1200 features such as PTT-ID and emergency alarm allow a truely functional public safety radio system without the costs os 800mHz. And patches can often be the solution for interoperatability with surrounding municipalities, regardless of their system type. Perhaps governments should consider more carefully before jumping on the 800mHz bandwagon just because it's "what the other guy's doing." The solution may be something more simple.