Jake68111
Member
Almost trampled on someone else's thread.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this method of doing things.
If I want to make 2 separate profiles, one named 536HP and one named SDS100, with two totally different FL's, one would think that those profiles, because they are being categorized as such (hence the reason for them being separate), would "save" independently from each other. Hook up the 536, open the 536 profile and the FL's that you last saved to that profile, populate. Hook up the 100, open the 100 profile and the FL's that you last saved to that profile, populate.
Is this a primitive form of thinking for the way the software "should" operate? I find the way I'd "like" to do it, which has come from years of using numerous software packages, as being the "norm" but the way we are "forced" to do it is like reinventing the wheel.
I've never really had to just "deal" with this till recently (with the SDS100 I now own 2 Unidens at the same time) and perhaps someone could make a guide for maintaining 2 separate radios for 2 separate purposes wanting both radios to have 2 different sets of FL's.
It's simply frustrating the way it is now. My rant is over and I feel much better. Now if I could only program without getting agitated.......
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this method of doing things.
If I want to make 2 separate profiles, one named 536HP and one named SDS100, with two totally different FL's, one would think that those profiles, because they are being categorized as such (hence the reason for them being separate), would "save" independently from each other. Hook up the 536, open the 536 profile and the FL's that you last saved to that profile, populate. Hook up the 100, open the 100 profile and the FL's that you last saved to that profile, populate.
Is this a primitive form of thinking for the way the software "should" operate? I find the way I'd "like" to do it, which has come from years of using numerous software packages, as being the "norm" but the way we are "forced" to do it is like reinventing the wheel.
I've never really had to just "deal" with this till recently (with the SDS100 I now own 2 Unidens at the same time) and perhaps someone could make a guide for maintaining 2 separate radios for 2 separate purposes wanting both radios to have 2 different sets of FL's.
It's simply frustrating the way it is now. My rant is over and I feel much better. Now if I could only program without getting agitated.......