Got it thanks. The only problem now is it keeps cutting in and out frequently worse than having close call set to priority. I'm using the RS800 antenna with full signal and RSSI of -100channel>frequency>channel
Just tried with stock antenna still same results.Got it thanks. The only problem now is it keeps cutting in and out frequently worse than having close call set to priority. I'm using the RS800 antenna with full signal and RSSI of -100
Darn expensive radio to listen to FM!
I am confused you bought a SDS100 to listen to fm radio?Mine just got returned to the seller because the audio on any FM station was atrocious; virtually zero treble, and actively clipped highs, even though the correct bandwidth was selected, with excellent signal levels. The same signals on my 436 sound fantastic, so it's definitely the SDS100 acting up. I'm almost afraid to order another one... if anyone has both the 436 and the SDS100, compare the two on a local FM station, and tell me if they're similar sounding to you. Mine were absolutely not. Thanks!
Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
I just tuned a few FM stations on mine and it sounded great. V12 it's obviously not hi fidelity like my car stereo system but it didn't sound choppy or over driven
I received my replacement last week, and noted that it came with the new battery and door; I updated the firmware, and this one is not much better on FM broadcast than my last one. I *really* hope they get the audio curve right eventually, or I'll be selling it and switching to Whistler. I mean, they already had the circuitry down with the 436; this is supposed to be an improvement, but right now, not so much...I have both. The 436 is better at FMB than the SDS100, mainly because the SDS100 firmware still uses the same audio frequency low and high cutoff frequencies for everything, which makes FMB sound like crap.