on page 1 and specifically includes H98KGH9PW7AN TANAPAs MNUD1005, MNUD1006, MNUD1011, MNUD1012, MNUD1017, and MNUD1018 on page 4.... APX 6000 ... radio models, when properly equipped with the FM-listed batteries NNTN7033, NNTN7035, NNTN7036 and NNTN8092A, are FM Approved as intrinsically safe for permitted use in hazardous classified location areas for Division 1, Class I, Groups C, D, and Class II, Groups E, F, G, and Class III, Temp Code T3C.
The APX radios are also FM Approved for use in Division 2, Class I, Groups A, B, C, D. Temp Code T3C.
Neither of our references address the routine inspection requirements (as gaskets and seals eventually dry up).FWIW, this says: on page 1 and specifically includes H98KGH9PW7AN TANAPAs MNUD1005, MNUD1006, MNUD1011, MNUD1012, MNUD1017, and MNUD1018 on page 4.
Disclaimer: IANA expert. Do not rely on this with regard to using your radio in hazardous environments. Ask whoever last serviced it.
We waiting on decision. We have already suggested this, but no decision as yet, think putting off till have to deal with it. Most of them are volumes broken or physical damage to plastic casings. used to test and confirm working before tossed in pending box. Will suggest againI don't suppose you could find out what the mine does to dispose of these failed APX6000 radio, by chance? I'm sure that plenty of people would like a chance to buy or bid on them.
The shop that recertifies it should be able to help. If you read any of this thread it would be obvious why Joe Dip**** can't just buy these labels and slap them on. And if your radio lacks the labeling, then it should fail the visual inspection and be sidelined until it can be recertified.Does anyone know of a source to get a replacement UL or FM label