A Coalition of Chicago Based Media Organizations Joins Together in Regards to CPD's Encryption

p25man123

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
87
Location
DuPage County, IL
DISCLAIMER: This has nothing to affect negativity or positivity in regards to encryption. This is information that is coming out from the media in their words.

An open letter was created from them directed to those that watch or listen to the media.


"To our Readers, Viewers, and Listeners,

Mayor Lori Lightfoot has revealed the City of Chicago's plan to block live transmissions of Chicago Police scanners - restricting access to transmissions that have always been available to the public and to the news media. We are a coalition of Chicago-area news organizations concerned with this planned encryption and are sharing our concerns to raise awareness about how the City's plan will impact our ability to provide timely, accurate and potentially life-saving news to you.

Our newsrooms monitor emergency scanner traffic to report everything from traffic congestion to developing threats to public safety.

As news unfolded about the July 4th shooting in Highland Park, the media and the public turned to police scanners and reporting informed by police scanners to take cover, to stay safe, to locate the missing. A coalition member was able to report on a shooting last month in Chicago's River North neighborhood as the perpetrators remained at large, alerting the public of this imminent danger.

But now, things have changed.

A shooting took place at a courthouse and police district in Chicago last week in broad daylight. The perpetrators fired more than 40 shots and escaped on an expressway. You did not see, hear, or read about that incident as it was happening. The City of Chicago prevented you from knowing about this dangerous incident by blocking all live scanner transmissions. This jeopardized the lives of everyone at that police department, everyone at that courthouse, everyone on that expressway.

Also last week, we learned that a man armed with a rifle was walking down the street in the city's West Pullman neighborhood. He was later shot by Chicago Police. We were not able to alert the public as it was happening. All of this took place around dinnertime, as people returned home from work and children returned home from school.

Real-time access to police scanners promotes transparency and accountability by law enforcement. An analysis of the scanner transmissions in the Uvalde, Texas school shooting revealed that law enforcement's response was not as local authorities had first portrayed it. The availability of scanner communications also directly led to the video recording of the killing of Alton Sterling by two Baton Rouge police officers. To put it simply, the media's informative reporting on these events would never have been possible without real-time access to scanners.

Earlier this year, we learned that Chicago officials intended to prevent Chicago media from hearing these essential real-time scanner transmissions. The City claimed several reasons for the switch, including minimizing disruptions by unauthorized users who transmit fake calls, preventing criminals from monitoring police, and maintaining the safety of first responders. The City has never identified members of the press as the disruptors. And members of the press are regularly in touch with officials to ensure that our reporting does not jeopardize police investigations or public safety.

We reached out to officials to ask that accredited members of the press be granted access to the newly encrypted channels, but the City responded that both the press and the public would only be provided access on a 30-minute delay. We strongly believe that any scanner transmission delay will negatively impact public safety and could put lives in jeopardy when mere seconds matter, for example, during an active shooter event, a tornado, a fire, a bomb scare, a plane crash; virtually any emergency event where the public might need to seek safety or shelter.

Further, in our view, encryption and delays run counter to resounding calls for greater transparency in law enforcement. The City has also already taken the liberty of completely removing some of these recorded transmissions from its delayed broadcast, effectively causing certain police or fire incidents to vanish - as though they never happened. This is censorship in its purest form.

We asked to meet in person with the City to further address these issues, but despite multiple attempts, Mayor Lori Lightfoot flatly refuses to even discuss the matter. In short, the Mayor's decision to restrict our access to scanner channels will harm our ability to keep you, our readers, viewers, and listeners, safe and informed, and render it more difficult to hold our government and its personnel accountable. To borrow language from the highest federal appellate court sitting in Chicago, "The newsworthiness of a particular story is often fleeting. To delay or postpone disclosure undermines the benefit of public scrutiny and may have the same result as complete suppression." We couldn't agree more."

CBS 2 Chicago
NBC 5 Chicago
ABC 7 Chicago
WGN-TV
Fox 32 Chicago
Chicago Sun Times
Chicago Tribune
Chicago Public Media


Sources:
 

ILjim

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
457
Location
Wilmette, IL
I really wish they'd extend that criticism to the suburban agencies since a majority of them are either now full ENC or are going there (looking at you DuPage County). I'll just leave it at that since I don't want this thread locked too soon or get taken down by a mod.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
5,866
Location
Chicago , IL

The following Zones are "currently" encrypted:

Zones 3,5/7,6,8,9,10,12,13

The following Zones are "currently" not encrypted:

Zones 1,2,4,11...all Citywides

The City P25 Trunking system is being used by all District Tact Teams (each has a car-to-car channel/the old Channel 5), Narcotics, Gangs, Vice & Prostitution, Marine Unit, Mayoral Protection Unit, Detectives Car-to Car per Area...I'm sure a few others I missed.
 
Last edited:

Elpato

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
75
NBC News made mention how Fire transmissions would also be delayed. How accurate that is could be debatable.
Only reason why they want to fight it this hard in the city is because it's where 90% of their crime reporting comes from. The big news companies don't give a crap about the suburbs
 

Elpato

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
75
just remember, when law enforcement goes encrypted and they want your help, all you need to say is no because i cant hear you anymore, its a too way street.
And how would you feel if you were a victim and no one wanted to give a witness statement or turn over security footage that could put the perp in prison because of some stupid silly reasoning like this?
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
5,866
Location
Chicago , IL
Always remember, the outrage, finger pointing and fist pounding that's going on now can be described as self-inflicted. Ask yourself how did I, or others in this hobby contribute to police departments (and some fire departments) across the country deciding to encrypt and essentially lock out the law-abiding citizens. What has changed from the good old days of Mom and Dad listening to the table top scanner in the kitchen? We just can't resist the temptations of keeping information to ourselves, but feel the need to jump on social media or other means to tell the world that you heard that bad accident call. It's changed from a "stay away from the scene", to recording and posting the information and in some instances become a hinderance to scenes. Add to this information on how to access and now interfere with analog transmissions, and we pushed them further away. This is why we're in this position now and have no one else to blame.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
5,866
Location
Chicago , IL
" xxxxx is filling up her suitcase w/ alcohol in the liquor department at xxxxx, she's wearing a purple robe."

"the Police Helicopter has the eyeball on the black Porsche xxxxxx, the subjects are armed, wanted in connection w/ a commercial burglary."


Gee whiz, why would CPD want to encrypt when tweets are going out like this.. :unsure:
 

R0am3r

Salt Water Conch
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 13, 2014
Messages
728
Location
Oneida County, NY

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
5,866
Location
Chicago , IL
I'm curious as to why Chicago Police encryption has now made it to the national news cycle. As mentioned, it was on Fox and Friends, saw it on Newsmax last night, all the local stations have picked up the story too. The timing makes it appear to be a "political hot potato" issue, and suspect it's more to hurt Lori Lightfoot then a genuine concern for public knowledge.

My interpretation or "read between the lines" on this is two fold. First...the attorney who keeps pushing for "media access". They're asking (without asking), for a radio to be programmed to monitor and scan all the encrypted zones, which I don't see happening. Second...Alderman Ray Lopez (on Newsmax) had another take on it. He encourages encryption usage, but also open communications for "public safety/don't want people driving into incidents" etc.

As I beat the drum and many "ol timers" agree, technology has ruined this hobby. We can't seem to stay away from the key boards when we hear something "juicy". The newsrooms no longer have to run 10 scanners, just pull up Tweet Deck and follow the select few who can't stop themselves. Delayed streaming supplied by the department(s) should become the norm rather than the rarity. Disabling archiving also gives the departments another layer of "control" and pushes media organizations, and the legal firms making FOID requests more often than not. A recent rash of burglaries to car dealerships, auto repair shops in the Albany Park area of the city (Zone1-16/17 Districts), makes me wonder if they're following the tweets of an individual who gives a play-by-play of nearly every dispatch he/she hears on that Zone? It's very hard to sell "public safety/media needs" when all they have to do is open Twitter and see this. In addition, those individuals solicit donations from individuals and organizations. That doesn't have the appearance of "public safety", but someone who's butt hurt because they're losing a source of revenue.

In order to sell this argument, we need to police ourselves, and departments need to bring the threats of legal actions if they disregard cease and desist orders. Will they go through that much trouble instead of just checking the box to secure the communications systems? That remains to be seen.
 

iowajm780

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2021
Messages
178
After what happened a couple of years ago during summer civil unrest, can you blame CPD for encrypting. Taking a $20 Boefang to interfere with and transmit fake help calls, profanity and threats to public officials and listening in to help commit their crimes had to stop. There can still be some issues, but taking the steps to secure communications is a start. Yeah, encryption sucks even for routine dispatch traffic but you can't take that chance for a radio terrorist to jeopardize officer safety. At least CPD is giving a delayed feed rather than nothing. Sounds like Mayor Lightfoot has refused to reverse course on the encryption or even have a face to face meeting with the newsies. So I am ready to be roasted by the scanner community and everyone has that right to make their opinions known.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
5,866
Location
Chicago , IL
Several of the stories report rouge radio interference as being a contributing factor for the encryption. When all the police need to do to curb rouge radios is go digital, no encryption needed.

We had the same issue on the Chicago Fire Department's analog system. Had "expedited training" on the new radios, and gradually made the switch. Never had a rogue radio again, no encryption needed.
 

CrabbyMilton

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
874
Here in Milwaukee, we have OPEN SKY which has had more than it's share of issues and guess what, it has done nothing to curb the violence. Milwaukee could have joined the OASIS system and in fact, has a permanent MFD patch to OASIS from OPEN SKY for interoperablity reasons.
There is some speculation that there is a setup/TG for the MPD to do this as well but nothing has popped up at least not on a regular basis. Yes sensitive info should be encrypted but not main channel traffic.
 

garys

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2002
Messages
6,094
I've been saying for several years that there are likely 1st and 4th Amendment issues around encryption. I won't beat all surprised if this ends up in the federal courts.
 
Top