A feed provider is broadcasting a TAC channel on the Broadcastify Live feed - EPSO TAC 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

David628

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
238
Location
Colorado
There is a local feed provider broadcasting a EPSO TAC 2 channel on Broadcastify which goes against the terms and conditions. El Paso County Sheriff Live Audio Feed

My message to the feed provider:

"EPSO TAC 2 is protected according to the Radio Reference terms of service.
Feed Provider Terms of Service - The RadioReference Wiki

Feed Provider Terms of Service
Feed providers agree to follow these terms of service when broadcasting to RadioReference.com

Law Enforcement Feeds
  • Feed providers agree to ONLY broadcast routine dispatch and special events channels and talkgroups for law enforcement agencies.
  • I agree to NOT broadcast dedicated tactical, car-to-car, SWAT, narcotics, detectives or any other channels or talkgroups that are not routine dispatch or special events related.
Law Enforcement Feeds
  • Feed providers agree to ONLY broadcast routine dispatch and special events channels and talkgroups for law enforcement agencies.
  • I agree to NOT broadcast dedicated tactical, car-to-car, SWAT, narcotics, detectives or any other channels or talkgroups that are not routine dispatch or special events related.

Quote Reply
Report Edit
Feed Provider Terms of Service - The RadioReference Wiki"

Please stop the EPSO TAC 2 feed.



x
 

David628

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
238
Location
Colorado
Here is the DM I sent to him.
Hi,

Not sure if you were aware but CSPD encrypted a few years ago and part of their reasoning was because a local feed provider in COS was feeding their channels. The CSPD deputy chief at the time specifically stated "Our radio comms are not a public information channel, its our lifeline".

Your EPSO feed includes a EPSO TAC 2 channel that shouldn't be feed in my opinion. I know its in the clear, but police TAC channels are taboo.

Im just going to say it like it is here I think this feed shouldn't be live because if the Sheriff gets wind of this feed and EPSO deputies keep pushing the issue they may decide to encrypt all channels. We lost so much when CSPD encrypted. Lets not let that happen to EPSO.

Thanks in advance for your understanding. Ive been an avid scanner listener since the early 1980's. I hope you understand my concerns.

Thanks
Dave
"
 

David628

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
238
Location
Colorado
DEC HEX Mode Alpha TagDescriptionTag
47101266DEPSO 1 N DispSheriff 1 - North DispatchLaw Dispatch
47111267DEEPSO 2 Tac 1Sheriff 2 - Tac 1Law Tac
47121268DEPSO 3 S DispSheriff 3 - South DispatchLaw Dispatch
47131269DEEPSO 4 Tac 2Sheriff 4 - Tac 2Law Tac
4714126aDEEPSO 5Sheriff 5Law Tac
4715126bDEEPSO 6Sheriff 6Law Tac
4716126cDEPSO 7Sheriff 7Law Tac
4717126dDEPSO 8Sheriff 8
 

David628

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
238
Location
Colorado
 

fredva

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
2,257
Location
Virginia/West Virginia
I think one post reporting the violation and saying that you sent the rules to the feed provider would have been sufficient. I personally wouldn't have sent the message saying it was my opinion that the TAC channel shouldn't be on the feed. That waters down the message.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top