A quick explanation for why I think that charging at very slow rates is not worth the trouble - the natural aging process!
Even if we treat our batteries with the utmost care, and try to maximize the lifecycles out of them with very slow charging, their capacity goes steadily downwards with every recharge.
I might get 8 years of life out of a brand new set of 2000 mah batteries with all the TLC in the world, but at 8 years, the cells might be only half that value when measured! I don't want the runtime that only a 1000mah battery will give me, so replacing them before they totally go dead is likely. Even at 4 years with some super TLC, I don't want to be using the aged equivalent of 1800mah.
That is why I personally have no problem with charging at a much faster rate at the expense of life-cycles - I can't beat the aging process, so I just get as much life out of them as I can with a rate of .5C until they no longer satisfy my runtime needs. This rate of charge provides a healthy delta-v signal, and also saves me time, but that isn't the primary motive - capacity is.
Along with this, is that every time we recharge a battery, even at slow rates, and especially with the standard nimh's, the cell impedance goes higher slowly turning the battery into a resistor. The Maha will actually give you a value for this impedance when first starting up so you can determine if you are dealing with a newborn, middle-age, or past-prime impedance.
I guess thats why I don't think that slow-charging is worth it in the long run if you value your time and want more capacity without carrying around a group of gingerly loved, but past their prime in capacity cells.