Best Police Scanners 2021 per money.com

Status
Not open for further replies.

GlobalNorth

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2020
Messages
2,299
Location
Fort Misery
I own a 536HP and while I like it, as the most current Experian advertisement says... ".. That app is trash!". I've never been able to get it to function correctly on an iPhone XR.

1615246005390.png
 

GlobalNorth

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2020
Messages
2,299
Location
Fort Misery
My other complaint about "articles" such as these is that the best device for one person is going to be the worst for someone else. Example: a California based listener wanting to get the CHP is going to need a scanner that excels in the VHF - Low band. Most scanners don't cut it. That listener moves to Arizona and wants to listen to AZDPS is going to need a radio that excels in the UHF and the 700 MHz bands as AZDPS slowly builds out their 700 MHz system. VHF Low is effectively dead in Arizona.
 

trentbob

W3BUX- Bucks County, PA
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
6,230
Very interesting, someone depending on money.com to tell them the best scanner to buy. I especially like their recommendation of the ws1025.

I could write an article for RR on the best investment vehicle to put money in. I would recommend the Bernie Madoff fund.:rolleyes:

Also interesting that they never mention the best scanners to buy. I didn't see them there.

Interesting thread.:)
 

fxdscon

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
7,460
My other complaint about "articles" such as these is that the best device for one person is going to be the worst for someone else.
Exactly... the author wants us to believe he is all-knowing about what scanners we need, but makes no mention whatsoever about the challenges of Simulcast, and what scanners are best for those areas.
 

N7OLQ

Scanning since '77
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 17, 2001
Messages
322
Location
Utah
You can't really take the article seriously when there is no mention of Uniden SDS scanners. Seems to have been written by someone who just read the advertisements and some comments on RR.
 

TailGator911

Silent Key/KF4ANC
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
2,687
Location
Fairborn, OH
Nice informative article, but I am baffled at the author's failure to mention the SDS scanners. Or simulcast/lsm and the technology that allows the SDS scanners to decode the transmissions. That is an integral part of the scanning hobby in 2021 that cannot be overlooked when providing information on radio scanners. That's akin to talking about bees without mentioning honey. Really?

Then again, 'For The Money' may exclude the pricey SDS scanners and disqualify them simply because of the cost. An honorable mention would have been appreciated by most, I would think.
 

David628

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
238
Location
Colorado
This article is just a money grab.

The click bait money grab pitch:

“The Best Police Scanners for Your Money”
The Best Police Scanners for Your Money

The very top of the article reads:
Money may earn a commission when you click on the products and services below. Opinions are our own,
but compensation and in-depth research determine where and how they appear. Learn more about how we make money.” The Best Police Scanners for Your Money



I seen the “learn more” link in blue highlight so I clicked the learn more link and got this:


“Disclaimers
Affiliate Disclaimers
How we make money
We take transparency seriously.
Our content is free because we partner with several advertisers who we have a paid relationship with. We earn a commission when you click on a link or make a purchase through the links on Money. If you choose to click on the links on our site, we may receive compensation. If you don’t click or use the phone numbers listed on our site, we will not be compensated. Ultimately, the choice is yours.”



Just another noobtuber “reviewer”...oops, sorry, I meant to say dedicated “journalist” product reviewer trying to make a dollar.
 
Last edited:

Patch42

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
372
Most media people are barely intellectually lucid enough to wipe themselves after taking a dump, so glaring errors and omissions in the dreck they write is to be expected. :rolleyes:
The funny thing is that most of us suffer from Gell-Mann Amnesia. We come upon an article like this, where we actually know the subject matter and recognize the author has barely clue one on the topic, we laugh about how ridiculous it is, then we turn the page and take seriously the next article written on a topic we don't know.

I remember many years ago reading a game review in PC Magazine. At that time "VESA" was just becoming known as a graphics standard and the term was being applied to a lot of different graphics-related things. There was a VESA standard mode for graphics card operations in which certain minimum standards for resolution and such had to be met. There was also a specialized VESA slot on some computers dedicated to a graphics card. The two things, other than being related to graphics and come from the same standards body, had nothing to do with each other. Well, in the review the author stated the game would only work with graphics cards that could plug into the VESA slot. This was not true, the game instead requiring a graphics card that had a VESA mode available, and was a laughable contention to anyone even remotely familiar with the topic. To me the worst part wasn't that the author didn't know the difference but that no one else at the magazine who reviewed the article apparently knew the difference. Then I turned the page and read with interest the review of the next game.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
I've seen enough of this sort of thing that I assume about 95% of what I read in the news is bull:poop:.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top