Most media people are barely intellectually lucid enough to wipe themselves after taking a dump, so glaring errors and omissions in the dreck they write is to be expected.
The funny thing is that most of us suffer from Gell-Mann Amnesia. We come upon an article like this, where we actually know the subject matter and recognize the author has barely clue one on the topic, we laugh about how ridiculous it is, then we turn the page and take seriously the next article written on a topic we don't know.
I remember many years ago reading a game review in PC Magazine. At that time "VESA" was just becoming known as a graphics standard and the term was being applied to a lot of different graphics-related things. There was a VESA standard mode for graphics card operations in which certain minimum standards for resolution and such had to be met. There was also a specialized VESA slot on some computers dedicated to a graphics card. The two things, other than being related to graphics and come from the same standards body, had nothing to do with each other. Well, in the review the author stated the game would only work with graphics cards that could plug into the VESA slot. This was not true, the game instead requiring a graphics card that had a VESA mode available, and was a laughable contention to anyone even remotely familiar with the topic. To me the worst part wasn't that the author didn't know the difference but that no one else at the magazine who reviewed the article apparently knew the difference. Then I turned the page and read with interest the review of the next game.