Boulder County

Status
Not open for further replies.

4436time

In Gov't We Trust
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
315
Location
Colorado
I haven't heard anything on these and am curious what they're for?

9100 238c D B C/C LAW Boulder County or City Law Law Tac
9101 238d D B C/C LAW Boulder County or City Law Law Tac
9102 238e D B C/C LAW-3 Boulder County or City Law Channel-3 Law Tac
 

resq197

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
129
Location
Berthoud, CO
At least some of the SO cars have DTRS radios installed for interoperability. Since that makes them DTRS subscribers, they're eligible for some TGs. I haven't heard them used for anything but testing.

As far as I know, there are still no plans for the City or County to move away from their VHF system.

-Brian
 

ecanderson

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
518
Location
Colorado
I haven't heard anything on these and am curious what they're for?
All as noted above. Neither the city nor county of Boulder have jumped on the DTRS bandwagon. VHF carries all but the requisite DTRS inter-op traffic. Some say it's a terrain issue. Personally, I have no idea.

Of some interest, Longmont continues to simulcast on VHF for their DTRS traffic since the 'switch' in late 2010. The good news is that it's the DTRS that's being simulcast on VHF and not the other way around, so the annoying 'ID chirps' that were ever present on their VHF rigs are gone when listening to VHF.
 

nathancarlson

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
278
Location
Longmont, CO
9102 Law 3 is used instead of yellow channel when Longmont is transporting to the Jail, to call and give them a heads up that they are coming. the others I have not heard used yet, either.
 

ecanderson

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
518
Location
Colorado
Thanks. I assume it's similar with 9103 & 9109?
I'm right on top of them, and have never had a single hit on either of those TGs (yet).

Of some interest, these guys are running people to the Boulder County jail all the time (no local jail here in the Longmont area), but only *once* in two weeks have I heard *any* traffic on 9102. If they're using it to announce a "delivery" there, It doesn't happen often. Should be picking it off Longmont, Mead or Gunbarrel, and I've got 9102 covered for 'hit count' on all three.
 

soundchaser

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
429
Location
Elevation 8308', Colorado
I'm right on top of them, and have never had a single hit on either of those TGs (yet).

Of some interest, these guys are running people to the Boulder County jail all the time (no local jail here in the Longmont area), but only *once* in two weeks have I heard *any* traffic on 9102. If they're using it to announce a "delivery" there, It doesn't happen often. Should be picking it off Longmont, Mead or Gunbarrel, and I've got 9102 covered for 'hit count' on all three.

You might try Thorodin. I didn't note the TGID, but I've heard Longmont contacting the Jail via the Thorodin site.
 

4436time

In Gov't We Trust
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
315
Location
Colorado
Maybe this is a good time to mention my reason for asking. You guys may or may not have seen my thread in the General Scanning forum, but what I'm trying to do is scan as many hi (and lo if possible) priority channels on all the systems around town in such a was as to hear as many major incidents as possible (police/fire/ems). I try to explain this in the thread and maybe it isn't clear, or that I'm asking in the wrong forum because I'm not getting much feedback.
Aside from buying more scanners (which I prefer not to do at this time), I think the best way to achieve this is by paring down my lists to include only the most hi/lo priority channels as possible. But I haven't been listening long enough to know what these are and not sure who to ask other than all the live feed providers in the area, which I hate to do...

So if you have time and are interested, here's the thread. Please feel free to update it or this one or I can create another here. If not, no sweat, I'll eventually figure it out. Thanks

http://forums.radioreference.com/general-scanning-forum/203281-best-way-catch-most-action-least-amount-scanners.html
 

GrayJeep

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Messages
967
Location
N. Colo.
This is the right forum to ask the question but lack of response suggests that there may not be many others trying to do what you are.

Asking questions about specific TGs like you have should get you pretty far toward your goal. The RR database just doesn't have enough info about the character of each TG.

I only get to know well the things I'm interested in (my commute, my work location, and my home location). Experience with that suggests to me how to optimize my program. ( It's never perfect. I think I'm working on 30+ iterations on the Pro-96 and 15 more on the Pro-197 that replaced it)
I bet most folks are the same way.
 

ecanderson

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
518
Location
Colorado
I think you'll find you're going to get caught between a rock and a hard place.

You need to consider the number of simultaneous 'high priority' calls that can occur in such a huge area as might be defined as "the Metro area". You're also going to be somewhat hamstrung by the inability to manually set a delay time on the HP-1. It's a cute unit, but just shy of perfection.

Unless you're prepared to invest in more hardware than just the HP-1 and the PRO197, it's not going to be possible to achieve what you hope to achieve.

The LE action in the Metro area by itself can keep two scanners operating pretty much full time, even if you avoid all of the data/clearance channels.

Trying to add FD and EMS action to that ... more hardware and ears that can multitask exceptionally well are your only hope of 'hearing it all', and even then, you have to be prepared to miss some stuff.

In your shoes, I'd consider paring back my coverage area to something a bit less ambitious, redefining "around town" as a somewhat smaller patch of turf.
 

ecanderson

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
518
Location
Colorado
Of note: Boulder GREEN north tower seems to have been down for a couple of days. No traffic on 158.85. Had to switch to GREEN central on 155.145.
 

nathancarlson

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
278
Location
Longmont, CO
I don't think I have ever caught Longmonts TGs on Mead for some reason. I always hear them on Sunset (Longmont) Bald North and sometimes Thorodin. I was hoping I could get them on mead so I could hear them further up north on my commute. Also, I have noticed on my pro-106 that the VC is 700 mhz even on an 800 mhz control channel. Maybe this is why I don't hear them on mead?
 

MikeyB

Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2004
Messages
688
Location
Centennial, Colorado
I don't think I have ever caught Longmonts TGs on Mead for some reason. I always hear them on Sunset (Longmont) Bald North and sometimes Thorodin. I was hoping I could get them on mead so I could hear them further up north on my commute. Also, I have noticed on my pro-106 that the VC is 700 mhz even on an 800 mhz control channel. Maybe this is why I don't hear them on mead?

I also hear them on Lookout regularly - Longmont PD at least. Still no FD on DTRS?
 

ecanderson

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
518
Location
Colorado
Also, I have noticed on my pro-106 that the VC is 700 mhz even on an 800 mhz control channel. Maybe this is why I don't hear them on mead?
I just set aside my 106 in order to deal with Mead. As you've likely noticed, it's a chocolately mess of 700/800. If you're trying to work Mead, you'll have to upgrade to a 197 to deal with the 700MHz issues. Really annoyed me since Mead used to be (if I recall correctly) just 800MHz.
 

ecanderson

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
518
Location
Colorado
I'm picking it up just fine right now.
And so was I on the way home from Denver this evening. Will report back, but I suspect they've done something to the CTCSS tone. I'm using that to break squelch on the PRO197 (where GREEN N seems to have disappeared), and my PRO106 in the car is just set to signal squelch (where GREEN N is being received just fine).
 

ecanderson

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 27, 2009
Messages
518
Location
Colorado
And so was I on the way home from Denver this evening.
Huh. Returned home to find GREEN N up and running on the home system without a hitch. Seems to have come alive sometime between 2pm when I left and 5pm when I hit the road to return.
 

jimmnn

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 11, 2002
Messages
14,370
Location
Colorado
I don't think I have ever caught Longmonts TGs on Mead for some reason. I always hear them on Sunset (Longmont) Bald North and sometimes Thorodin. I was hoping I could get them on mead so I could hear them further up north on my commute. Also, I have noticed on my pro-106 that the VC is 700 mhz even on an 800 mhz control channel. Maybe this is why I don't hear them on mead?

Logging Longmont PD Ch-1 (9515) radio id's 354xxx from the DIA area currently off Mead Site 112 loud and clear.

That's with a tried and true Pro-96 workhorse also, since the CC remains 800MHz.

Jim<
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top