DSD+ Fastlane ... praise + ideas

[Marco192]

Hi guys!
I am a long time DSD+ user, and coming from the free version to the Fastlane version recently was a great revelation.
Fastlane helped me discover so much new info on TIII and Cap+ networks in my area, and it helped me to understand how those systems work. Stability is also great and running 3-4 SDR receivers is no problem.

My ideas/suggestions/wishes for the future of Fastlane would have to be: focusing on trying to get most of the bandwidth that a single SDR receiver provides. It would be great to have multiple virtual tuners (in lack of a better term) on a single SDR receiver that would allow to monitor both the CC and use several VCs simultaneously, or monitor several CCs (sites) simultaneously (provided that all the CCs and VCs are within the 2 mhz range like in my area). All the data is already there, provided by the SDR receiver, and ready to be used.

Hopefully we will some of this in the future.

 

[Reconrider]

If you want to follow more than 1 system, or more than 1 site at a time, you might want to use unitrunker instead of dsd.

Dsd uses 1 sdr per frequency entered(site) and uses the systems known neighbor sites to log and voice.

 

[Marco192]

Can unitrunker decode signaling on DMR TIII networks?

I know how DSD works ... hence my suggestion for improvement

 

[Forts]

No, UT does not work with TIII DMR systems. SDRTrunk does to some extent... you may want to give that a peek. I find it's not that friendly for logging groups/info etc however.