Dual Band Mobile Antennas Under $100

Status
Not open for further replies.

vagrant

ker-muhj-uhn
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
3,564
Location
California
I have the Diamond MR77 which was included with some other items I purchased. It works in a pinch if I need to pop an antenna on a temporary vehicle, but the performance of the Diamond NR770HB surpasses it. I use one of those Diamond motorized antenna thingy's, the K9000 or something secured to my luggage rack, so I'm using a NR770HB to complement it.

Anyways, for NMO use has anyone compared the Diamond NR770HNMO and the Larsen NMO 2/70B? I am curious.
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
7,256
Location
Sector 001
Anyways, for NMO use has anyone compared the Diamond NR770HNMO and the Larsen NMO 2/70B? I am curious.


3.0/5.5 dBi gain (UHF/VHF), So real word is 0.85/3.35dBd... I'm thinking those are not accurate, at least the Diamond website specs for the antenna is probably supposed to be dBd not dBi. Really, the specs are about the same. It is probably a slightly shortened 1/2 wave on VHF and a 5/8 wave over 5/8 wave on UHF. Exactly the same as the Larsen antenna.

The fold over will be the weak spot on the Diamond, and why I would never buy it. It WILL hold water, and it WILL eventually become a big issue... Likely resulting in antenna failure.(hopefully not radio failure) The Larsen is a superior antenna to the Diamond. Better to spend the money on the Larsen.
 

N4KVE

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
4,328
Location
PALM BEACH, FLORIDA
Anyways, for NMO use has anyone compared the Diamond NR770HNMO and the Larsen NMO 2/70B? I am curious.
I've had the Larsen on my car since 1992, & it's great. About 2005 a friend suggested trying the Diamond, which I did. Worked the same as the Larsen. Great coverage, & low SWR, but today I use neither on my car. I'm in the enviable position of living where there are too many repeaters. With the arrival of DMR, & 3 different locally linked systems, maximum range is not the priority, but rather low profile. Since there's a repeater practically every 5 miles, this is what I now use. I use one for UHF, & another for 900 MHz.
https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=32575
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,340
Location
United States
Anyways, for NMO use has anyone compared the Diamond NR770HNMO and the Larsen NMO 2/70B? I am curious.

Not me. Considering they are very similar in price, I wouldn't spend my money on an amateur/consumer grade antenna when you can get a professional antenna with a known track record.

I'll agree with the others, fold over mounts WILL fail. Larsen has a proven track record in real world environments.
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
7,256
Location
Sector 001
Not me. Considering they are very similar in price, I wouldn't spend my money on an amateur/consumer grade antenna when you can get a professional antenna with a known track record.



I'll agree with the others, fold over mounts WILL fail. Larsen has a proven track record in real world environments.


100% agree. The Larsen NMO 2/70 is a solid antenna, when used with an open coil element. I have, however, seen enclosed coil, NMO2/70 antenna elements fail. Usually it is a combination of water penetration, and long key-downs at 50-75w, while stationary. The failure is the enclosed delay coil in the antenna element melting, I have not seen the base coil fail.

Considering the cost difference between the Diamond and Larsen, I would take the Larsen every time.
 

N4KVE

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
4,328
Location
PALM BEACH, FLORIDA
I have, however, seen enclosed coil, NMO2/70 antenna elements fail. Usually it is a combination of water penetration, and long key-downs at 50-75w, while stationary. The failure is the enclosed delay coil in the antenna element melting,
I have been using this exact antenna since 1992, & it still works perfectly. For a few years with a 100 watt UHF MCS2000. Just used it yesterday, but now it's on a 45 watt DMR radio.
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
7,256
Location
Sector 001
I have been using this exact antenna since 1992, & it still works perfectly. For a few years with a 100 watt UHF MCS2000. Just used it yesterday, but now it's on a 45 watt DMR radio.



I have used both versions, open and closed coil. I like the open coil better. Especially here in Alberta where they use corrosive material on the highways in the winter for de-icing. My closed coil version never failed either.
 

N4KVE

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
4,328
Location
PALM BEACH, FLORIDA
I have used both versions, open and closed coil. I like the open coil better. Especially here in Alberta where they use corrosive material on the highways in the winter for de-icing. My closed coil version never failed either.
None of my antennas have ever seen snow, & live a quiet life in Florida. I do remember when they sold both versions, & I preferred the original design.
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
7,256
Location
Sector 001
None of my antennas have ever seen snow, & live a quiet life in Florida. I do remember when they sold both versions, & I preferred the original design.



Yea, salt and road grime coupled with long key downs are the death of closed coil antennas.

I have even seen non Lasen closed coil hammy toy antennas melt(think Commet and Diamond).

Having also used both, I much prefer the open coil. My job takes me in the sticks and I have yet to have issues with tree branches with it.

The open coil does not suffer from the problems the closed coil antenna have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top