• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

FCC mandating P-25?

Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,306

There’s no federal mandate as yet regarding a deadline to switch over to a P25-ready system, but one is expected as counties across Pennsylvania and the country have been doing preparations or already meet P25 standards, according to Beveridge and county commissioners.

“There is no way around it — it is not an option,” Eric Henry, chairman of the commissioners, said last week. “It’s only a matter of when the federal government says you must do it. They’ll give you a five-year window.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,878

There’s no federal mandate as yet regarding a deadline to switch over to a P25-ready system, but one is expected as counties across Pennsylvania and the country have been doing preparations or already meet P25 standards, according to Beveridge and county commissioners.

“There is no way around it — it is not an option,” Eric Henry, chairman of the commissioners, said last week. “It’s only a matter of when the federal government says you must do it. They’ll give you a five-year window.
Yeah; I have seen that "Federal Mandate" argument used to persuade commissioners before. Amazing what the power of suggestion can accomplish. There is no federal mandate to narrow band 800 MHz, there is no federal mandate to employ P25 in any form. But many /\/\illions have been made using only the power of suggestion.
 

N4DES

Retired 0598 Czar ÆS Ø
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,391
Location
South FL
If there is DHS grant money attached there would be a P25 requirement, but there is no requirement that the agency must use it for their day-to-day operations and subscribers just have to be purchased with the capability. 700 MHz public safety spectrum is the only area mandated for P25 by the FCC, so if the agency isn't going there then there also isn't a requirement to use it, but if they are then there is a requirement by the FCC.

 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,878
The DHS grant money will never close the gap to pay for a P25 system versus analog. An agency can still opt out of P25 and fund the system themselves, for less money. They may have to seek a different vendor however.
 

N4DES

Retired 0598 Czar ÆS Ø
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,391
Location
South FL
The DHS grant money will never close the gap to pay for a P25 system versus analog. An agency can still opt out of P25 and fund the system themselves, for less money. They may have to seek a different vendor however.
The grant money is typically for subscribers, which when rolling out a new infrastructure and purchased together could eat upwards of 50% of the total cost for an agency. So yes it could close the gap with a good grant writer.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,878
The grant money is typically for subscribers, which when rolling out a new infrastructure and purchased together could eat upwards of 50% of the total cost for an agency. So yes it could close the gap with a good grant writer.
A lot of if, ands and buts in that assertion.
 

N4DES

Retired 0598 Czar ÆS Ø
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,391
Location
South FL
They are still out there....



But let's not get off-topic.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
6,878
The DHS grant money will never close the gap to pay for a P25 system versus analog. An agency can still opt out of P25 and fund the system themselves, for less money. They may have to seek a different vendor however.
N4DES. I think you may have misread my comment. I was speaking of grant money covering the differential of an entire system. Not just subscribers. I have in past done a number of budgetary analysis of both options, tens of millions, simulcast, and the grant monies never closed the P25 gap. On topic? Perhaps, because if it were a federal mandate, it would be unfunded.
 

ai8o

Brachiating Tetrapod
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
331
Location
Lexington, NC
Yeah; I have seen that "Federal Mandate" argument used to persuade commissioners before. Amazing what the power of suggestion can accomplish. There is no federal mandate to narrow band 800 MHz, there is no federal mandate to employ P25 in any form. But many /\/\illions have been made using only the power of suggestion.
This is what happens when you have NON technical people County commissioners)making decisions about technical matters.
 
Top