• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

FDC Seatac UHF TRS notes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
682
Location
Object-oriented
#1
FDC/BOP tracks well, data follows:

GRE setting- Moto VHF/UHF
Custom trunking table 1:
Base- 406.000
Offset- 397
Spacing- 12.5
Lo- 397
Hi- 759

Freqs noted a/o 3/30/08

406.600- Control
407.050- Voice P25
407.325- Voice P25
408.250- Voice P25
410.525- Voice P25

TG's noted

32- Corridor/housing units- most activity
48- Count done this channel


Sorry there's not more; I didn't have a lot of time to run the TGs today.
 

commstar

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 22, 2001
Messages
349
Location
Spokane, WA
#4
Brett,
Thanks for taking the time to make the posts about the McChord, Lewis & FDC TRS. Great info. I too am much to far away to hear this system but have saved it for future consumption.

A question for the right honorable database admin: First, thanks for all the work you do here- appreciated by me for one.

Cannot this information be harvested from directly from here and added to the DB without a formal submission?

As discussed, the sheer numbers of posts here is quite small- So, is a formal submission a requirement to get it into the DB or cannot a DB Admin harvest something that catches his eye and submit it him/herself and add it pro-actively or is that precluded by management?

Just wondering, not finding fault or questioning policy-merely posing a question. Again thanks for volunteering your time to the benefit of all.

.
 

lowboy654

DB Admin Member
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
2,239
Location
Northwest, WA
#5
commstar said:
Brett,
Thanks for taking the time to make the posts about the McChord, Lewis & FDC TRS. Great info. I too am much to far away to hear this system but have saved it for future consumption.

A question for the right honorable database admin: First, thanks for all the work you do here- appreciated by me for one.

Cannot this information be harvested from directly from here and added to the DB without a formal submission?

As discussed, the sheer numbers of posts here is quite small- So, is a formal submission a requirement to get it into the DB or cannot a DB Admin harvest something that catches his eye and submit it him/herself and add it pro-actively or is that precluded by management?

Just wondering, not finding fault or questioning policy-merely posing a question. Again thanks for volunteering your time to the benefit of all.

.
I did make the changes for McCord and FT. Lewis read this link and it will explane why I said that he should submit it.http://www.radioreference.com/forums/showthread.php?t=101901
 

lowboy654

DB Admin Member
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
2,239
Location
Northwest, WA
#7
Wilrobnson said:
FDC/BOP tracks well, data follows:

GRE setting- Moto VHF/UHF
Custom trunking table 1:
Base- 406.000
Offset- 397
Spacing- 12.5
Lo- 397
Hi- 759

Freqs noted a/o 3/30/08

406.600- Control
407.050- Voice P25
407.325- Voice P25
408.250- Voice P25
410.525- Voice P25

TG's noted

32- Corridor/housing units- most activity
48- Count done this channel


Sorry there's not more; I didn't have a lot of time to run the TGs today.
This system is staged to be added here Thanks for all of your great submissions
 

lowboy654

DB Admin Member
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
2,239
Location
Northwest, WA
#8
OK this system has been add here, and if you have anymore stuff that you would like to see added here let me know, I would be more than glad to have it added here.
Thanks for your input.
Ken
 

dste

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
196
Location
Renton, WA
#9
Perhaps a few minor changes can be made.

The system type is Mot UHF Type II
SYSID is D01A
Connect tone is 116.13
Control Chans are 406.6 407.05 407.325 408.25

All TGIDS observed so far include
16 ATG
32 Ch 1 Operations
32 Ch 2 Counts
64 Ch 3
80 Ch 4 Misc
304 Emergency
 
Last edited:

lowboy654

DB Admin Member
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
2,239
Location
Northwest, WA
#10
dste said:
Perhaps a few minor changes can be made.

The system type is Mot UHF Type II
SYSID is D01A
Connect tone is 116.13
All Chans are control Chans *

All TGIDS observed so far include
16 ATG
32 Ch 1 Operations
32 Ch 2 Counts
64 Ch 3
80 Ch 4 Misc
304 Emergency
very cool I will add them.
Thanks, Ken
 

dste

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
196
Location
Renton, WA
#12
I just corrected my self and the prior post as I just noticed the new freq 410.525 on UniTrunker. I am not sure when this came online. It is not indicating as a control chan.
 

dste

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
196
Location
Renton, WA
#14
Hmmmmm....


System Name: Federal Detention Center SeaTac
Location: Sea Tac, WA
County: King
System Type: Project 25 Standard <=============== Mot UHF II
System Voice: APCO-25 Common Air Interface Exclusive
Last Updated: Updated Talkgroups (6 Updated, 0 Deleted)
Hits: 51

A minor thing, but it would cause someone to mis-program such an important system :)
 

dste

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
196
Location
Renton, WA
#16
Ok, I will defer to your judgment. I just see this system more like McChord and PSNS than like the DOD 380 systems.

My scanners require it to be set as Mot II UHF with the custom table. The system does not have a WACN or NAC that I can see and doesn't seem to transmit it's bandplan as a Project 25 system does.

Unitrunker also IDs it as a Mot type II UHF/VHF. It looks very diferent from the DOD 380 systems around here with Unitrunker.
 

dste

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
196
Location
Renton, WA
#17
Thanks, Lowboy654

After going back to the Wiki and looking at ASTRO IMBE, I was not so sure about it after all. I just want it to look and ultimately work correctly on download.
 

dste

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
196
Location
Renton, WA
#19
First it needs to be in a bank that does not trunk anything else since the custom table takes over the complete bank.

Enter the 4 CCs in sequential locations anywhere in the bank 406.6 407.05 407.325 408.25 and make them all mode type MO as you go.

Program-Trunk and then Mode to set the bank to MOT

Program-Trunk-Func-2 to enter the custom table: base 406 Off 397 step 12.5
be sure to press Enter on each one.

Program-Trunk-Func-3 to set the cc mode to Table. Press Enter.

Manual and start scanning.

Good Luck.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top