ComradeGlock
Member
Below is a link to a document by the FRA released in February 2023 that despite its title, shows the amount of research going into studying “RF spectrum scarcity”. This project by the FRA focuses on the 160MHz band used by the Railroads and whether or not it’s suitable for some of the data activity either on or planned for in the 220MHz band.
The article is a pretty interesting read thru (document) page 9, then it devolves into a technical morass and you really don’t come up for air again until doc page 49 for the conclusion.
Bottom line, (spoiler alert): “These findings set the stage for the next project phase, which will focus on the design and development of a universal software radio framework for the rail industry. The 160 MHz design will be used as a case study to realize the transceiver design as a fully featured implementation that will then be used for real-world field testing”.
My reading between the lines here (ymmv) is if this testing (and others like it) is successful and the FRA and Railroads believe that existing and/or planned wireless systems/processes can be moved or started in the 160MHz band as opposed to the already full 220MHz band, then that’s when the voice comm’s will move to VNB and free up needed bandwidth in the 160MHz band. Now, this may not be right around the corner, but I believe it will be sooner rather than later and will happen way before the FCC mandates anything.
I would guess the “transceiver design” they mention is for data comms as that is clearly the future of railroading. The move from reactive sensors to predictive sensors is a very high priority, and all of those extra sensors need to be able to talk to a wireless network, and that requires bandwidth. And lots of it.
PDF.js viewer
The article is a pretty interesting read thru (document) page 9, then it devolves into a technical morass and you really don’t come up for air again until doc page 49 for the conclusion.
Bottom line, (spoiler alert): “These findings set the stage for the next project phase, which will focus on the design and development of a universal software radio framework for the rail industry. The 160 MHz design will be used as a case study to realize the transceiver design as a fully featured implementation that will then be used for real-world field testing”.
My reading between the lines here (ymmv) is if this testing (and others like it) is successful and the FRA and Railroads believe that existing and/or planned wireless systems/processes can be moved or started in the 160MHz band as opposed to the already full 220MHz band, then that’s when the voice comm’s will move to VNB and free up needed bandwidth in the 160MHz band. Now, this may not be right around the corner, but I believe it will be sooner rather than later and will happen way before the FCC mandates anything.
I would guess the “transceiver design” they mention is for data comms as that is clearly the future of railroading. The move from reactive sensors to predictive sensors is a very high priority, and all of those extra sensors need to be able to talk to a wireless network, and that requires bandwidth. And lots of it.
PDF.js viewer