G5RV antenna questions

Status
Not open for further replies.

AlphaMikeLima

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
57
Location
Norman, OK
Hey guys!

Just got one of these antennas a few months ago and had a questions about its set up. I've heard using coax from from so-259 connector was a poor design, and a better feed line would be to just use ladder line all the way, use a 1:1 balun , and then a short piece of high quality coax to the tuner. Would this be a better design than just a coax air balun at the connector then to the tuner?

Thanks!
 

kb2vxa

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
6,100
Location
Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
The G5RV antenna employs a matching section consisting of twin lead between the dipole and balun for a proper SWR on the non harmonic band, 15M. Running twin or open wire transmission line "all the way" defeats the purpose and it becomes an ordinary dipole so for 15 you'll need a tuner. Leave it the way G5RV designed it and you'll be happy with it.
 

AlphaMikeLima

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
57
Location
Norman, OK
Thanks kb2vxa!

One more question, is RG-58 really that bad? I always hear it get a bad wrap but I have alot of it. I know RG-8X is much better, but will i experience that big a difference if I'm only running about 50-60 feet of RG-58?
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
Always use at least RG-8 (or RG-213) if possible. RG-58 is that bad. :) I'm being sarcastic but the losses are very high even on HF -- 50-60ft is a substantial length and losses do happen. This is especially important if you're transmitting. Not so much if it's just a listening antenna.
 
Last edited:

jim202

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
2,736
Location
New Orleans region
Always use at least RG-8 (or RG-213) if possible. RG-58 is that bad. :) I'm being sarcastic but the losses are very high even on HF -- 50-60ft is a substantial length and losses do happen. This is especially important if you're transmitting. Not so much if it's just a listening antenna.


Hate to break this news to you, but the cable loss is the same no matter if your using it for RX or TX.

Loss is loss. It doesn't matter which direction your trying to use the coax cable.
 

SCPD

QRT
Joined
Feb 24, 2001
Messages
0
Location
Virginia
Hate to break this news to you, but the cable loss is the same no matter if your using it for RX or TX.

Loss is loss. It doesn't matter which direction your trying to use the coax cable.

I wasn't debating that issue. Some people don't want to invest the $$ for quality coax. If it's just for Rx then it may not be of critical importance to the listener.
 

kb2vxa

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
6,100
Location
Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
Alright you guys, SPREAD OUT! (Never mind the Stooges, let's clear this confusion up.) Since a G5RV is an HF Amateur bands antenna that should give you a clue as to it's frequency spread. RG-58U sucks raw eggs above 30MHz but there's no serious problem below it unless you have an unusually long run like 100' or more. With 50-60' of the stuff loss is fairly insignificant except to a pedant so let's not split hairs.

One final note, the antenna should handle the full legal limit but I wouldn't expect 58 not to go into meltdown. At that power level RG-8U should be used, it laughs at 5KW.

"I always hear it get a bad wrap..."
I was a maintenance electrician for Alpha Wire and Cable and had the grand opportunity to repair the mad spider that wraps coax in it's shield. I can say with a fair degree of certainty RG-58 gets as good a wrap as all the others. I can say with absolute certainty you meant to say it gets a bad rap and IMO it's well deserved. <boo, hiss, boo>
 
Last edited:

LtDoc

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2006
Messages
2,145
Location
Oklahoma
The 'G5RV' is a very nice 20 meter antenna, which was all that Mr. Varney ever intended it to be. That it could be used on harmonically related bands was just incidental. It's also commonly known that it is not a very good antenna on those harmonically related bands. If you think that it is a good antenna on bands other than the one it was designed for, then it's fairly obvious that you've never used a common resonant dipole on those bands. It's also a very good idea to have a tuner if you use a G5RV, it will certainly help. Worrying about using RG-58 coax with a G5RV is a bit silly. There are too many other more important factors that will cause losses.
RG-58 gets a bad rap undeservedly. Assuming that you have a good quality of RG-58, and that you don't plan on long runs of it, and it's for HF use, it will do as well as most other types of coax. I think it's most common fault is that it isn't very 'robust', it's sort of 'fragile' in nature. That's because of it's typical construction. It does very well for most of the common uses of it, such as mobile feed line runs, even at VHF, if the run isn't too long as with a mobile antenna.
- 'Doc
 

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,447
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
I gotta third that. RG-58 is not great coax but for low power or HF applications it is not so bad either. It often gets a bad rap across the board because it is pretty ugly at higher freqs.

Yes, I run RG-213 or better for all of my HF runs here (all of my VHF/UHF are heliax or hardline), but then I have several runs over 400 feet. If I was dealing with 100 feet or less and HF, particularly for low power (below 600 Watts) or for receive application, I would not be overly concerned with using RG-58.

Losses for 100 foot lengths at 30 MHz (losses get better as you go down in freq):
RG-58/U - 2.5 dB
RG-8X (Belden) - 2.0 dB
RG-11 - 1.4 dB
RG-213/214 - 1.2 dB
LMR-400 - 0.7

So, the difference between RG-58/U and RG-213 at 30 MHz with a 100 foot run is going to be around 1.3 dB (it will vary with brand). Realistically I rather doubt you can tell a 1.3 dB difference on an HF SSB or AM signal, I am pretty sure I can not. Sure, for something like EME where you are already working at the ragged edge, and at natural noise floors, such a difference is indeed important, but not so much for HF.

Don't get me wrong, run the best you can get if that is what you want. But don't say that RG-58 can't be used either. I am sure most users will not even notice the difference between basic RG-58 and the best you can buy hardline for short run HF applications. But, there is a difference between cheap coax of any kind and good quality stuff.

T!
Mohave Desert, California, USA
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,912
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
The G5RV was designed as a 20m gain antenna that would fit within the confines of Mr. Varney's garden and it happens to be a reasonable size for 80 through 10m operation with a tuner. The critical length balanced line section was intended to match the antenna to 75ohm coax on 20m only without a tuner but any other band will need a tuner.

If you need to extend the feedline beyond the approximate 31ft matching line its best to run balanced line all the way to the tuner. Attaching 50ohm coax will cause additional loss way beyond what is specified for the coax due to the coax being operated in an extreme mismatch condition. Adding 100ft of RG-58 can easily cause 10dB or more loss on some bands even though RG-58 is only rated for a few dB loss at HF.

I ran a test on my G5RV at work and adding 100ft of LMR-400 made a very noticeable degradation on 80m. That's with LMR-400 which is only rated for a fraction of a dB loss at HF and it dropped my S meter on receive and people could notice my transmit level was down. Using smaller coax will run the loss through the roof!

Another clue that coax is causing excessive loss is I took a new commercially made G5RV with about 60ft of RG-8X attached and the internal tuner in my radio would match it fine on all bands. I removed the coax and the internal tuner would not match it hardly anywhere, especially on the lower bands. The added coax helps smooth out the match partially due to loss because its an attenuator when used under these conditions.

So don't assume the loss between your antenna and radio is whats listed in the coax catalog, you can only apply those numbers when feeding an antenna that is well matched to the coax or a dummy load that matches the coax impedance.

If your using a dipole type antenna for multiband operation use balanced line all the way to the radio/tuner and you will get the most out of your antenna system.
prcguy
 

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,447
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
If you need to extend the feedline beyond the approximate 31ft matching line its best to run balanced line all the way to the tuner. Attaching 50ohm coax will cause additional loss way beyond what is specified for the coax due to the coax being operated in an extreme mismatch condition. Adding 100ft of RG-58 can easily cause 10dB or more loss on some bands even though RG-58 is only rated for a few dB loss at HF.

I ran a test on my G5RV at work and adding 100ft of LMR-400 made a very noticeable degradation on 80m. That's with LMR-400 which is only rated for a fraction of a dB loss at HF and it dropped my S meter on receive and people could notice my transmit level was down. Using smaller coax will run the loss through the roof!

Another clue that coax is causing excessive loss is I took a new commercially made G5RV with about 60ft of RG-8X attached and the internal tuner in my radio would match it fine on all bands. I removed the coax and the internal tuner would not match it hardly anywhere, especially on the lower bands. The added coax helps smooth out the match partially due to loss because its an attenuator when used under these conditions.

So don't assume the loss between your antenna and radio is whats listed in the coax catalog, you can only apply those numbers when feeding an antenna that is well matched to the coax or a dummy load that matches the coax impedance.

But, I believe what you are describing is a function of interaction with the electrical length of the coax used and the mismatched load, not a function of the specific type of coax itself.

The losses described in coax catalogs are normally pretty close. And should be pretty close up to significant VSWRs, say VSWR on the order of 9 dB or better.

The interaction of mismatched loads and coax electrical length is a different story totally. If you take a piece of RG-58 and an identical _electrical_ length (vs physical length) of LMR-400 you should get approximately the same results between the two at HF frequencies. If you take two random lengths of each and operate them into a mismatched load the results are going to be totally unpredictable (OK, maybe not totally unpredictable, but very complex and beyond this discussion). In some cases the RG-58 will actually perform as the better of the two, depending on what your unit of "better" is.

Also, I have seen commercial versions of the G5RV out there that used the supplied coax as part of the matching network. Any changes to the coax supplied caused variations in match and performance. I had one of these at one time, long story short the PL-259 at the end of the coax got damaged and I cut a couple feet off and installed a new PL-259. The SWR went up and the performance went down, but only on some bands. Thinking I had messed up the &#8211;259 install I installed another, several times, trimming a little coax length each time. The VSWR and performance were all over the place, each iteration different from the last. I eventually replaced the entire piece of coax with one identical to the original, and all was back to normal.

T!
Mohave Desert, California, USA
 
Last edited:

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,912
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Coax electrical length does come into play but I'm pointing out pure loss from operating the coax in a very high VSWR system. A G5RV has upwards of 20:1 or worse mismatch on some bands at the end of the twinlead and feeding coax at that point is a very lossy proposition.
prcguy

But, I believe what you are describing is a function of interaction with the electrical length of the coax used and the mismatched load, not a function of the specific type of coax itself.

The losses described in coax catalogs are normally pretty close. And should be pretty close up to significant VSWRs, say VSWR on the order of 9 dB or better.

The interaction of mismatched loads and coax electrical length is a different story totally. If you take a piece of RG-58 and an identical _electrical_ length (vs physical length) of LMR-400 you should get approximately the same results between the two at HF frequencies. If you take two random lengths of each and operate them into a mismatched load the results are going to be totally unpredictable (OK, maybe not totally unpredictable, but very complex and beyond this discussion). In some cases the RG-58 will actually perform as the better of the two, depending on what your unit of "better" is.

Also, I have seen commercial versions of the G5RV out there that used the supplied coax as part of the matching network. Any changes to the coax supplied caused variations in match and performance. I had one of these at one time, long story short the PL-259 at the end of the coax got damaged and I cut a couple feet off and installed a new PL-259. The SWR went up and the performance went down, but only on some bands. Thinking I had messed up the –259 install I installed another, several times, trimming a little coax length each time. The VSWR and performance were all over the place, each iteration different from the last. I eventually replaced the entire piece of coax with one identical to the original, and all was back to normal.

T!
Mohave Desert, California, USA
 

kb2vxa

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
6,100
Location
Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
Haven't you noticed the OP disappeared once his question was answered and your techie mumbo jumbo impresses nobody but yourselves? (;->)
 

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,447
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
Haven't you noticed the OP disappeared once his question was answered and your techie mumbo jumbo impresses nobody but yourselves? (;->)

But, the OP did get his questions answered. And, as far as I am concerned, once the best attempts have been made to answer a question there is nothing wrong with the conversations meandering on into other related issues. Hijacking a thread before the answers are out there is bad form, but continuing the discussion past that point into other areas after the basics have been addressed is just a logical progression.

Coax electrical length does come into play but I'm pointing out pure loss from operating the coax in a very high VSWR system. A G5RV has upwards of 20:1 or worse mismatch on some bands at the end of the twinlead and feeding coax at that point is a very lossy proposition.
prcguy

No one doubts or should question that there is additional significant loss in very high VSWR situations. This loss is on top of and additive with the original loss value (matched-line loss) of the coax. This means that the lower the matched-line loss value, the better, my statement was that the examples you were giving, more than 10 dB on a 100 foot run, have to include other factors. “Adding 100ft of RG-58 can easily cause 10dB or more loss on some bands even though RG-58 is only rated for a few dB loss at HF.” My general contention is, and was, that the RG-58 would not be hugely different from RG-213 in such an application, as long as we are talking about low power and HF. Both feedlines are going to have SWR induced losses, although they will be different.

The additional line loss due to VSWR is fairly well understood. The current edition of the ARRL Antenna Book even has a nice little section on it and a chart to help calculate what this loss can be. They also have the math present if you would rather work it out yourself, but I trust the chart. Chapter 24, page 10, figure 14.

And what all that comes down to is that with a 20:1 VSWR the difference in loss of RG-58U (with a matched-line loss of 2.5 dB / 100 foot at 30 MHz) and RG-213 (with a matched-line loss of 1.2 dB / 100 foot at 30 MHz) will not be large. In fact the RG-213 will have about 6.4 dB total (matched-line loss plus SWR induced additional loss) while the RG-58 will have about 8 dB total. Or about 1.6 dB difference between them. Higher VSWR will raise all of these values, including the delta between them, but the delta is going to be the smallest change.

There are many good reasons to run good, high quality, coax. But, RG-58U often gets hammered far harder than it should. For some applications it simply is not bad. It might not be as good as other feedlines, but sometimes the difference is pretty small.

T!
Mohave Desert, California, USA
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
16,912
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Warren,
Normally a post like yours below doesn't warrant a response of any kind, but I understand and accept you with all your wonderful flaws and I don't take anything you say personally. After a very long day at work its good comic relief.

I think its ok practice for people to continue a topic that someone else started and toss information, ideas or experiences back and forth if its on topic. If the moderator doesn't like it they'll chime in.
prcguy

Haven't you noticed the OP disappeared once his question was answered and your techie mumbo jumbo impresses nobody but yourselves? (;->)
 

kb2vxa

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
6,100
Location
Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
"Normally a post like yours below doesn't warrant a response of any kind..."
Not in print anyway but on the other side of a monitor somebody's shaking his head and clucking his tongue.

"After a very long day at work its good comic relief."
That was the whole point, maybe Token lacks your sense of humor or missed my wink?

"I think its ok practice for people to continue a topic that someone else started and toss information, ideas or experiences back and forth if its on topic."
I never said it wasn't.

"If the moderator doesn't like it they'll chime in."
None have ever even commented on my sarcasm, either they laugh or groan behind the scenes but either way I'm safe. (;->) There I am again winking at you...
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,742
Location
Bowie, Md.
It's beginning to wander a little bit- let's get back on topic, please. Thanks...Mike
 

AA1LL

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
42
Location
Mason, NH
Here's a copy of the graph I think Token was talking about. This is relevant for the G5RV case for general use across 2-30MHz because the coax has high VSWR on it at most frequencies and feedline loss will degrade received SNR, especially during winter months when external noise is low. Since there is no matching between the open wire line and coax on a G5RV, I would bet that the VSWR on the coax off-resonance could approach 10:1. But even at that, you're only talking about a couple dB more loss due to VSWR that you can't get back by matching. You have to weigh that against the advantage of having the antenna high and away from man made noise sources. My experience is that the best thing is to extend the open wire line into the shack to a non-ferrite balun, then through a coaxial antenna tuner, to the radio.
 

Attachments

  • lossDueToVSWR.jpg
    lossDueToVSWR.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 1,451

zz0468

QRT
Banned
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
6,034
...My experience is that the best thing is to extend the open wire line into the shack to a non-ferrite balun, then through a coaxial antenna tuner, to the radio.

I agree with you but then, by definition, it is no longer a G5RV antenna, but something else entirely.
 

kb2vxa

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
6,100
Location
Point Pleasant Beach, N.J.
Right zz, like I said it becomes an ordinary dipole. (;->) Just to add my 2c worth to AA1LL's comment, better yet an air wound balun (B&K made an excellent one) like we used in the days before ferrite. Best of all is a balanced output tuner!

I have good reason for saying that, I nearly fried a so called 3KW tuner (the ferrite balun arced) trying to load a 160M open wire ladder line fed sloping V on 80M. As luck would have it Murphy reared his ugly head and it turned out the transmission line being a close 1/2 wave on 80 so the tuner was effectively looking into the antenna's voltage node... OOPS! No, the Collins S Line station was completely off, no KWS1 here. It was a wee little Johnson Valiant pushing a puny 120W, the moment I started to call CQ on AM the modulation peaks triggered this awful hissing sound and I dropped carrier just in the nick of time.

The koala hates Qantas, I hate ferrite baluns. (;->)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top