A few thoughts on that post (above at 10:13 by Utah_Viper")-
1- WE do need to update RR DB ongoing. In some places it needs Geotags, in other places new licenses will be issued, systems will re-band- any database is only as good as its administration. I've been scanning CT SP and MA SP for years with various scanners, but when I drove to MA with a GPS attached to the HP-1 I never heard a single MA SP transmission until I make a favorites list manually....the DB does need us to help update it.
If you have doubts about the DB needing input to the admins, read this post by 'ericcarlson' who is
Lead Database Administrator and Manager
RadioReference.com
http://forums.radioreference.com/database-discussion-forum/186365-location-information-airports.html
Eric says [partial outtake]: "....The message you see just indicates that the location has not been set yet in the RR DB. You can help us by submitting updates with the appropriate lat/long and range (a circle approximating the area in which the frequencies are used). Range should be not be the "monitorable" range but should reflect the actual range in which it is used. E.g., the circle should encompass a city limits not anything larger. For an airport, it should just encompass the area of the airport since operations should be contained within that. Air traffic control for the tower would extend a couple miles out (to whatever the FAA-assigned tower control territory is)....."
The idea, however, you mention of "....if the scanner had a scanning feature (imagine that in a scanner) they could easily find things and then add them to the RRDB themselves...."- can you imagine if every newbie out there in this new and broad market segment that Uniden is addressing were to just add freqs into the DB themselves??
There's a submission process for adding info to the database and a whole forum dedicated to it.
2- *BUT* I also think a lot of people that pick up the HP-1 for the first time, even if it's not their first scanner, are going to have a learning curve. We've already seen a number of posts in various forums where someone says the product doesn't work, it's got bugs, etc only to find out they didn't have LAW DISPATCH selected under services....or they had 'AVOID-ed' the system or county they wanted, or their range is set to zero and the radius of the system they're looking for only reaches to within 8 miles of them.
I'm still very pleased with mine but A) I won't be returning it because it lacks search/scan between capabilities as that's not a feature in the product description. And B) I think people who buy the HP-1 ** and follow the directions** will almost always find it scans their local PD and FD unless they're encrypted.