IC-R9500 USA pricing

Status
Not open for further replies.

whitenoise

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2004
Messages
44
The ICOM IC-R9500 now shows up on universal-radio and AES websites for $13,500. You can order now (says available in April). Was FCC approved on 23rd of Feb.
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Location
S.E. Michigan
That price is ludicrous! It brings an old saying to mind... "A fool and his money are soon parted!"
 

mtindor

OH/WV DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
11,030
Location
Carroll Co OH / EN90LN
GreatLakes said:
That price is ludicrous! It brings an old saying to mind... "A fool and his money are soon parted!"

And it's amazing to think just how many fools of that calibur are out there. I guess if you have enough money to easily plunk down 13.5K on a receiver like that for your hobby, then you either have more money than you know what to do with or you've had prior experience with filing bankruptcy before rofl.

Of course I'll admit that its a serious receiver and has some very legitimate (or not so legitimate) uses by organizations. But for a hobbyist, that's ridiculous.

Mike
 

Turbo68

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
878
Location
East Devonport,Tasmania,Australia
I suppose its no different than spending it on another Hobby and thats cheap in the US you Pay 20 Gran in Australia.

Regards Lino (Melbourne Australia) ALINCO-DJX2000E,AOR-3000A,AOR-8200MK3,ICOM-R5,ICOM-R20,ICOM-PCR1000,ICOM-R9000,ICOM-R9500,UNIDEN-245,UNIDEN-780,MAYCOM-AR108,UNIDEN-396,UNIDEN-996,RADIO SHACK-PRO96,REALISTIC-PRO2035,YAESU-VR500,YAESU-VR5000,YAESU-VX7R.
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Location
S.E. Michigan
I wonder how good it really is? Keeping in mind, it's just a receiver, not even a transceiver. How good can it be?
 

jonny290

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
687
Location
Denver, CO
these rigs are beautiful receivers meant for pulling in super weak signals, have incredible filtering capabilities, hard switched (relays at $50 a pop, not PIN diodes at $2) bandpass filters, etc, etc.


And yes, it will receive p25 (though for legal reasons they can't include it in the default package, unfortunately)


The only thing these radios pull in better than weak sideband signals are sour grapes, however. ;)
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Location
S.E. Michigan
jonny290 said:
these rigs are beautiful receivers meant for pulling in super weak signals, have incredible filtering capabilities, hard switched (relays at $50 a pop, not PIN diodes at $2) bandpass filters, etc, etc.


And yes, it will receive p25 (though for legal reasons they can't include it in the default package, unfortunately)


The only thing these radios pull in better than weak sideband signals are sour grapes, however. ;)


My old IC-R7000 had electro-mechanical relays, incredible filters, etc. It cost about 1/10th as much.

Why would the P25 option be omitted for legal reasons? It can be obtained from Universal Radio in Ohio.
 

crayon

RF Cartography Ninja
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 27, 2002
Messages
3,065
Location
36°33'01.2"N 98°56'40.1"W
I liked Batdude's line of reasoning about Ham P25 systems:
Batdude said:
yes, we use motorola radios.

yes, we operate in digital mode.

yes, it's legal.

yes, it costs as much as a new car.

stop spouting off about something you have no clue about.
The R9500 combines several pieces of state-of-the-art equipment into one device. I would love to have one myself, the same as I would love to have an IFR 2945 and would not hesitate to plunk down the money for either.

Perhaps, someday. :)
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Location
S.E. Michigan
This site has some great new pictures of the IC-R9500. You can click on them to enlarge them too! I have to admit, it looks super, but how do we know it's not just a glorified IC-R8500 hidden inside? :wink:

http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
 

jonny290

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
687
Location
Denver, CO
Why would the P25 option be omitted for legal reasons?

Japan's down with the D-Star, and it'd look bad if Icom "backed" D-star on paper but instead included P25 reception by default in their flagship receiver. They did, however, want to make it available, due to the high percentage of P25 in use in this radio's market.

I guess legal should be "marketing/political" reasons, really.

Edit: Here's the FCC type acceptance page for the R9500. The full manual is included. Can take a look and judge if it's a rewrapped receiver or not; I'm thinking not.


R9500 FCC page
 
Last edited:

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Location
S.E. Michigan
jonny290 said:
Japan's down with the D-Star, and it'd look bad if Icom "backed" D-star on paper but instead included P25 reception by default in their flagship receiver. They did, however, want to make it available, due to the high percentage of P25 in use in this radio's market.

I guess legal should be "marketing/political" reasons, really.

Edit: Here's the FCC type acceptance page for the R9500. The full manual is included. Can take a look and judge if it's a rewrapped receiver or not; I'm thinking not.


R9500 FCC page


Some of my comments were tongue-in-cheek. I have no doubt it's a great receiver. But I also have no doubts it's not worth $13,000.00...not unless my life depended on it. Even then my wife would argue with that! :wink:
 

jonny290

Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
687
Location
Denver, CO
na, just by my semi-uneducated eye, I'd ballpark the true worth of this around 6 to 8,000 bucks, when you take into account the DSP and decoding onboard. It really does have a pile o' tricks, but they're just trying to bleed Feds with that price tag. They know Homeland Security is loaded.
 

eorange

♦RF Enabled Member♦
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
3,028
Location
Cleveland, OH
GreatLakes said:
I wonder how good it really is? Keeping in mind, it's just a receiver, not even a transceiver. How good can it be?
If you understand and need these requirements:

The Icom IC-R9500 achieves amazing performance by using a D-MOS FET array in the 1st mixer (below 30MHz) and an excellent IMD roofing filter. The IC-R9500 has +40dBm IP3 and 109dB dynamic range at 14.1MHz. IP3 performance is +9.8dBm at 50MHz and +6.2dBm at 620MHz (+5dBm (typical) from 30MHz to 3335MHz).
...then it's that good for you. If you don't, then it's overkill.

Also note this is marketed as a Professional receiver. For most companies and professional organizations, $13K is a drop in the bucket.
 

Turbo68

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
878
Location
East Devonport,Tasmania,Australia
Hello I am not a technical Person and I do not go by Receiver specs the Reason is if you dont have a good Antenna you are not going to get anywhere and I got the ICOM-R9000 and the new R-9500 connected to a DRESSLER-ARA2000LL and I also use an AOR-5000 and I Also use custom made Antennas for the Airbands and I can listen to Aircraft on VHF over 1000 km away on a full signal strength and a clean signal and thats no different to Hand Held Receivers.

Regards Lino (Melbourne Australia)
 

eorange

♦RF Enabled Member♦
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
3,028
Location
Cleveland, OH
You know, I was just wondering that same thing - what antenna would give this receiver full performance??
 

iMONITOR

Silent Key
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
11,156
Location
S.E. Michigan
eorange said:
You know, I was just wondering that same thing - what antenna would give this receiver full performance??

Considering the rig has three antenna connections on the back, one SO239 type, and two "N" type, you would definitely need more than one antenna! With it's wide frequency range, you'd need an antenna farm to take full advantage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top