902
Member
I need to put another thing out there about radio use and what's been more useful to me.
About 13 years ago, I used to drive from the Midwest back home in the Northeast along the Interstate several times a year, usually during the summer and winter. I would usually drive through a snow storm or two. I did have a 2 meter and 440 radio (and a CB), but second to the CB, the most useful radio was HF. I had 14.300 up and would check in as a mobile. I would get "flight following" from the net control, and if something happened and I couldn't call 9-1-1 directly, I had someone on the other end of the radio who could do that for me.
So, anyone who wants to use amateur radio while driving longer distances, I would recommend checking into the nets, particularly the ones that are not geared to rag chewing like the ones on 14.300. That and CB have been way more valuable to me than monitoring 2 meters and 440, whether it's repeater or simplex.
About 13 years ago, I used to drive from the Midwest back home in the Northeast along the Interstate several times a year, usually during the summer and winter. I would usually drive through a snow storm or two. I did have a 2 meter and 440 radio (and a CB), but second to the CB, the most useful radio was HF. I had 14.300 up and would check in as a mobile. I would get "flight following" from the net control, and if something happened and I couldn't call 9-1-1 directly, I had someone on the other end of the radio who could do that for me.
So, anyone who wants to use amateur radio while driving longer distances, I would recommend checking into the nets, particularly the ones that are not geared to rag chewing like the ones on 14.300. That and CB have been way more valuable to me than monitoring 2 meters and 440, whether it's repeater or simplex.