Yesterday morning they were using encryption. They must have turned it on temporarily. Back off today.
They had "a case" going on.Yesterday morning they were using encryption. They must have turned it on temporarily. Back off today.
In my opinion they should just do what Waterford does. Encrypt their channel 2 or tac channels and leave the main clear.
I haven't gotten that on CLMRN. That one might be only for that site.Been watching some other ID's coming across the scanner and they are encrypted. Judging by the pattern of the numbers I am guessing they are Norwich Police.
20403
20407
Dont know if I am correct on it, but its the best guess I can come up with.
Log the radio IDs
Ahh dang. See if he would get an sdr and upload it to the bcalls. I could gather the radio IDs and make a list to compare.I am actually watching a scanner feed from a friends scanner. I can see the ID/alpha tag pop up but thats about it. The person in question lives in Norwich so its possible they keep their radio traffic on that part of the system only.
I have '1851096' as an affiliate with norwich pd.Certainly in the Norwich range. The Norwich IDs would be 104xxxx.
If you see Municipal TGIDs that match up with the RIDs following the Tax Town ID formula, it is almost certainly a legit talkgroup. If you have a weak signal and see a mismatched numbers or if you see a small town with a group in the upper range of the 100 assigned groups, it may be bogus.
chris
I thought 185XXXX is Department of Corrections?I have '1851096' as an affiliate with norwich pd.