"Odd" behavior regarding unique/actual Radio IDs and DSDplus.radios file

Status
Not open for further replies.

wx2watch

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
76
Reaction score
70
Location
Merrimack River Valley, MA
Hi All, I’m currently running DSDplus2p390 and I am monitoring a federal (NPS) phase 1, P-25 system with the goal of identifying the individual handheld radios, as “gathered” from the DSDplus.radios file. However, I have encountered some odd behavior regarding the names/radio ID of several radios.

When the AllSeenRadios window shows the “realtime” radio traffic IDs , at least three radios of this group (823, 854, 882) ALL display as 559 and NOT as a unique ID even in DSDplus.radios. (i.e. they do not appear at all within the file but I know they exist – see next paragraph)

(I have identified approximately 60 radios, all with a unique ID number. I also happened to have physical possession of the three radios in question that do not appear in the DSDplus.radios file)

Maybe a bug with DSDplus or could it be a programming issue within the Moto system set-up?

Can anyone tell me what parameter DSDplus is looking at to cause this behavior?

(i.e. Obviously the Motorola systems “knows” all the radios but DSDplus appears to not know all.)

Thanks,
John
 

cg

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2000
Messages
5,121
Reaction score
1,606
Location
Connecticut
Where are you getting your info from as to 823, 854, 882? Etched into the front of the radio? DSDPlus simply reports the data seen over the P25 signal. I doubt those three IDs are somehow a bug in the program where there is no history of similar reports for the past however many years that the program has been out.
With the limited information given, I would guess a programmer cloned the radios and didn't change the radio ID on the target radios.

chris
 

wx2watch

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
76
Reaction score
70
Location
Merrimack River Valley, MA
Where are you getting your info from as to 823, 854, 882? Etched into the front of the radio? DSDPlus simply reports the data seen over the P25 signal. I doubt those three IDs are somehow a bug in the program where there is no history of similar reports for the past however many years that the program has been out.
With the limited information given, I would guess a programmer cloned the radios and didn't change the radio ID on the target radios.

chris
Yes, the IDs are engraved on the radios I had access to. Not trying to bash DSDplus! I was just wondering about what parameters it (and the Moto programming) look at to determine the true ID of the radio in question. (please note I'm not saying I would understand the technical jargon but Chris' explanation sounds on target to me. ) THANKS for the response.
 

wx2watch

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
76
Reaction score
70
Location
Merrimack River Valley, MA
Doesn't the other two radios display the ID of the first radio if you push the PTT, or even do a private call between them?

/Ubbe
To answer Ubbe's questions:

1)The "odd" radios do display on other Moto HTs as 559 when I transmit with them.

2) Unfortunately, I don't know anything about private call - I'm just a "push to talk" user on this system.


So, I'm gonna go with Chris' explanation. (Probably best for me to let this go rather than bumping a request up the chain of command... ha,ha)

And once again, thanks to all for your interest in solving/explaining this non-issue to me.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
16,597
Reaction score
15,366
Location
BEE00
Sounds like whoever programmed them forgot to change the subscriber ID when cloning from the template codeplug. Oops. Have them sent back to the radio shop to get the correct ID's in them.
 

KevinC

32D2T/957.282
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
14,086
Reaction score
22,556
Location
I'm everywhere Focker!
Sounds like whoever programmed them forgot to change the subscriber ID when cloning from the template codeplug. Oops. Have them sent back to the radio shop to get the correct ID's in them.

I wonder how may “wrong audio” issues this has caused?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top