pro 97/2055 question

Status
Not open for further replies.

bigdaddyduke

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2005
Messages
9
Location
from parts unknown (aka Maine)
when scanning through the channels some channels on both scanners show there being a CT code (or CT search)...however on most channels (that I know have a code) nothing shows up in the display.

Any ideas why?
Chris
 

n2mdk

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2007
Messages
2,450
Location
Ames, IA
What mode are those channels stored in FM or CT, they need to be in CT for it to display.
 

edmondcops

Member
Joined
May 27, 2002
Messages
32
Location
Edmond, OK
Of course, it's always possible that some of your freqs don't have a CTCSS tone encoded, thus no display. But CTCSS is one of the things l love about the PRO 97. Makes the squelch irrelevant, which helps with weak-signal reception.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2005
Messages
241
edmondcops said:
Of course, it's always possible that some of your freqs don't have a CTCSS tone encoded, thus no display. But CTCSS is one of the things l love about the PRO 97. Makes the squelch irrelevant, which helps with weak-signal reception.

One thing I do not like about using the CTCSS/DCS feature (I use it all the time when I know it), is that, with the 97 or the 2055, the scanning process stops and the scanner locks up on a CTCSS/DCS channel that has no activity AND the squelch is TOO tight (for instance, fully turned ccw), .... the scanner stops and parks at that "noisy" inactive channel.. forever.

Whenever I see that the scanner is apparently scanning only one of the banks I selected for scanning, and hear no activity for a long time, I get suspicious and then press the MAN button to see if the "signal-present" icon (jagged lightning bolt at the end of the second display line) is turned on. If so, I would turn the squelch knob cw until the icon disappears and hopefully not move the setting unintentionally, like when adjusting the volume.

Do other brand scanners act the same way with CTCSS/DCS channels? i.e., lock on noise?

Thanks.
Peter
 
Last edited:

n2mdk

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2007
Messages
2,450
Location
Ames, IA
That problem has nothing to do with CTCSS settings it's simply the squelch threshold setting is to low, that will happen on any conventional frequency, with any radio.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2005
Messages
241
What I mean to say is that when the scanner is parked on a channel like I described, I have no idea that the scanner is not scanning (if I am not watching the display) like I think it is (scanning), because the audio is squelched, and I do not hear noise. The audio is squelched because the subaudible PL tone I set for that channel is not present in the noise.

My question still stands: do other scanners lock on noise even with a PL?... or do they detect the absence of a carrier and then let the scanner go on scanning?

Peter
 
Last edited:

n2mdk

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2007
Messages
2,450
Location
Ames, IA
OK now I understand better yes all PL/DCS encoded radios will do that, that's one reason that unless you have a problem with RF it's better not to use the the code squelch for receive.
No I'm wrong if the code squelch is on the radio shouldn't keep the scanner on the channel if it's not active.
 
Last edited:

gmclam

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 15, 2006
Messages
6,413
Location
Fair Oaks, CA
PRO-97 CT/DC mode...

ILikeHatchChili said:
...My question still stands: do other scanners lock on noise even with a PL?... or do they detect the absence of a carrier and then let the scanner go on scanning?
If the channel is programmed as "FM", then only the carrier controls the squelch. If the channels is programmed with a tone (not in tone search mode), then when a carrier (or enough noise to break the signal squelch) is detected, the scanner must stop long enough to attempt to decode a tone. With a good signal it does not take long to determine the tone and the scanner either opens the audio squelch or moves on. But if the signal is poor, it does seem to take longer than I'd like to decide to move on (since the correct tone is not present).

Considering all the bugs I've found in GRE scanners, and the fact they can't seem to make the 2 second delay work correctly, I must assume that they are not handling this issue correctly either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top