• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Proposal to FCC for VHF Low Band Channels on GMRS and FRS

Status
Not open for further replies.

kc2asb

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,716
Reaction score
2,469
Location
NYC Area
The future is digital radio not VHF low. Due to skip the bands are pretty much unusable. A nationwide DMR system for personal use would be the best use of 460 MHz and 151 MHz GMRS/FRS. The users would pay a subscription fee. YMMV. IMHO.
Subscription fee? No thanks. I'll just use a phone.
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
1,826
Reaction score
1,682
Location
Southwest, IL
Yes, exactly my point. I pay a subscription fee for a cell and a landline. I will not pay another one for something that imitates a radio. :)
Exactly...Why in the world would I pay to talk on a radio using "insert digital mode here". I'm willing to pay for a lot of things in life. At one time paid for commercial radios for my business but that stopped about the time everyone had cellphones. We still use short range stuff for actually on the job but I bought those radios used at a fair price and it's one time and done. If I need do contact them further phones work.
 

kc2asb

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,716
Reaction score
2,469
Location
NYC Area
Exactly...Why in the world would I pay to talk on a radio using "insert digital mode here". I'm willing to pay for a lot of things in life. At one time paid for commercial radios for my business but that stopped about the time everyone had cellphones. We still use short range stuff for actually on the job but I bought those radios used at a fair price and it's one time and done. If I need do contact them further phones work.
Makes perfect sense. Cell phones fill the need for most people. Turning GMRS into a subscription based digital service will not attract more people to use it. They will see it as duplicative. Also, the telecommunications companies have grabbed enough off the plate.

I doubt the low band GMRS proposal will go anywhere. It's probably not needed, but I won't be disappointed if the FCC does approve it.
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
1,826
Reaction score
1,682
Location
Southwest, IL
I doubt the low band GMRS proposal will go anywhere. It's probably not needed, but I won't be disappointed if the FCC does approve it.
I won't be disappointed but, I won't celebrate either. Would I ever play there? Sure, probably cause you know that's what we do! :)
 

nokones

Newbie
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
1,102
Reaction score
570
Location
Sun City West, AZ
Paradise already has an Open GMRS Repeater on the air that covers the area very well. If my old people memory serves me right, I believe North Valley GMRS Commumications may have been instrumental in making that happen for the community. The repeater was in service prior to the Camp Fire and survived the fire. The repeater does have emergency backup power.
 

DeoVindice

P25 Underground
Joined
Sep 27, 2019
Messages
630
Reaction score
722
Location
5150 Level
The future is digital radio not VHF low. Due to skip the bands are pretty much unusable. A nationwide DMR system for personal use would be the best use of 460 MHz and 151 MHz GMRS/FRS. The users would pay a subscription fee. YMMV. IMHO.
Why? We should be working towards decreasing centralization and corporate control over personal communications, not strengthening it.
 

kc2asb

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
1,716
Reaction score
2,469
Location
NYC Area
The segments they want for low band GMRS are the following:

  • 43.71 - 44.49 - transportation?
  • 46.60 - 46.98 - old cordless phone band
  • 48.75 - 49.51 - ???
  • 49.66 - 50.00 - low power walkie talkies, old cordless phone handsets
It will not infringe on MO HP on 42MHz, and does not appear to impact any other frequencies allocated to public safety. The military does have exclusive allocations in 46.60 - 47.00 and 49.60 - 50.00 MHz.
 

rescuecomm

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
1,583
Reaction score
338
Location
Travelers Rest, SC
Wiki shows under personal radio services that other countries have VHF-LOW frequency allocations intended for outdoor recreation use. The allowed transmit power is pretty low.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,790
Reaction score
4,984
Except for 42.96 MHz & 42.98 MHz, 42 MHz freqs will only be licensed to State Law Enforcement Agencies. 39 MHz, 44 MHz, and 45. MHz are usually licensed to local (non-state) government entities.
If the State patrol is primary user, they certainly can have agreements for mutual aid with local agencies.

That said, staying on topic, I think you have established that these frequencies are not the ones being sought. The proposal looked at unused frequencies in the band and went after them. I see elsewhere that the proposer is staunchly anti linking of UHF GMRS, so that is sort of coloring my enthusiasm.
 

nokones

Newbie
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
1,102
Reaction score
570
Location
Sun City West, AZ
If the State patrol is primary user, they certainly can have agreements for mutual aid with local agencies.
The State has to be the primary user or it will never pass the APCO frequency coordination committee.

As with the California Highway Patrol (CHP) being the primary user, the CHP did grant permission to a gazillion Federal, State Corrections, County, and various Cities Prisoner Transportation Units for Statewide communications and only on the Statewide Blue Frequency. CalTrans (State Highways) and a few County Communications Command Vehicles had permission on the various local Primary & Statewide Blue Frequency.

Also, there were a few County Sheriff Departments/Offices that were secondary control points for after-hours dispatching services in rural areas and they had their own Radio Station Authorizations for the respective remote sites on the 42 MHz freqs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top