Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thorny41587

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Location
Holland, OH
I was listening to ham band today, and they were saying how the repeater was weaker than normal, he said, "I can tell it's de-sensing the scanner". What does de-sensing mean?
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
15,217
Reaction score
2,044
Location
Indianapolis, IN
OK after over 20 years in scanning.. thats a new one on me....

I can understand if they said "overloading", or "losing lock", or heck, even "losing squelch"...... but desensing....... *Shakes head*

Must be thier version of saying its not a strong enough signal to "break squelch" on the scanner????
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
15,217
Reaction score
2,044
Location
Indianapolis, IN
And I learn something new everyday.... THANKS for the website...
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
milf said:
OK after over 20 years in scanning.. thats a new one on me....

I can understand if they said "overloading", or "losing lock", or heck, even "losing squelch"...... but desensing....... *Shakes head*

Must be thier version of saying its not a strong enough signal to "break squelch" on the scanner????

Desense is a very specific effect.

Not saying that the Ham was using it correctly or not.
 

nd5y

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
12,643
Reaction score
4,993
Location
Wichita Falls, TX
N_Jay said:
Not saying that the Ham was using it correctly or not.

You got that right! I hear hams (and public safety) pretty often
attempting to sound smart by using "big words" that don't make any sense.

Tom
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
15,217
Reaction score
2,044
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Still waiting on one of them to say I got a new rig that can "supercalifragilisticexpialidoscious" on all bands.....

WEG
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,058
Reaction score
53
N_Jay said:
milf said:
OK after over 20 years in scanning.. thats a new one on me....

I can understand if they said "overloading", or "losing lock", or heck, even "losing squelch"...... but desensing....... *Shakes head*

Must be thier version of saying its not a strong enough signal to "break squelch" on the scanner????

Desense is a very specific effect.

Not saying that the Ham was using it correctly or not.

OK. I'll say it. He was most likely using the term incorrectly.

You CANNOT desense a receiver that is on the same frequency as the offending transmitter. It's a technical impossibility.

Desense is the desensitization (the real form of the word) of a receiver to radios signals due to a strong nearby transmitter emission. What happens is the transmitter effectively blocks the weak signal you are trying to receive - very much like someone shouting in your ear while you are trying to hear a distant whisper. That's an extreme example, but it does get the point across.

He likely meant that the signal was weak or not breaking the squelch. In either case, the signal was not strong enough to receive and really couldn't desense the receiver if it were on an adjacent frequency.

The only way it could have been desensing his scanner by being weaker than normal is if it were putting out spurs that were on frequencies near those the guy was trying to hear on his scanner. Spurs use transmitter power and reduce the strength of the intended frequency's carrier. So, the TX could have been weaker, and the spurs were causing the desense, but I seriously doubt this was the case.

Joe M.
 

kc4jgc

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
1,546
Reaction score
60
Location
Virginia Beach, VA
I agree that the term was probably used incorrectly.

To make it simple:
Desense refers to a station listening to a frequency while another station nearby on an adjacent freq is transmitting. The strength of the transmitting station is unsually enough to affect the reception of the first station on his freq by a noticable drop in strength of the signal he/she is recieving. Once the transmitting station stops, the signal strength of the signal the first station is recieving returns to normal.

A common situation would be 2 mobiles talking to each other on the same repeater. If the 2 mobiles were to come close to each other (maybe 1/4 mile or less apart), thier transmissions (on the repeater input freq) would begin to desense each other's recievers (on the repeater output freq). The 2 mobiles would notice a "hiss" on the recieve as well as the recieved signal level from the repeater would be degraded.

Hope that explanation helps.

Steve
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,058
Reaction score
53
Thorny41587 said:
I was listening to ham band today, and they were saying how the repeater was weaker than normal, he said, "I can tell it's de-sensing the scanner".

Maybe he meant that HE was able to desense the scanner (not that the repeater was desensing it) and that the repeater was not strong enough to overcome the desense and still make it into the scanner fully quieted while he was transmitting.

Joe M.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top