RE: loumaag
Sorry guys,
I don't mean to undermine your authority by opening a closed topic like this but there is no way it can be left like that.
I couldn't help but notice that yet ANOTHER complaint was brought up against loumaag, and that is was closed without any real resolution. In fact all that was really achieved was a nice little spin maneuver that attempted to make it seem like moderation in general was the problem. I think we've all been quite clear in the past and present that it's one member of the moderating staff in particular that has been causing problems.
I understand that a lot of the members here act like children and that a lot of our input is treated as such, but how many times does the same issue have to be brought up by separate people before it is looked at more seriously?
Now I can see if this were an isolated case of a member calling out a moderator over some petty squabble, but I could probably pull up a list of threads just like this one if I queried "loumaag" in the search function of this forum.
The issue with loumaag is not his inability to moderate. The main issue is his mouth. He's never short on smug comments. It's not enough to close a thread, he's always gotta have his little zinger in there right before he does. Just in general, the way he conducts himself in this forum is not representative of a moderator IMO, and it's obviously rubbing a LOT of people the wrong way.
I'll just say this one time.. From one webmaster to another. I understand that the way you run this site is not a democracy. But it's never good when you begin to fall out of the good graces of your general user base. I might consider giving us a bit more credit..
Sorry guys,
I don't mean to undermine your authority by opening a closed topic like this but there is no way it can be left like that.
I couldn't help but notice that yet ANOTHER complaint was brought up against loumaag, and that is was closed without any real resolution. In fact all that was really achieved was a nice little spin maneuver that attempted to make it seem like moderation in general was the problem. I think we've all been quite clear in the past and present that it's one member of the moderating staff in particular that has been causing problems.
I understand that a lot of the members here act like children and that a lot of our input is treated as such, but how many times does the same issue have to be brought up by separate people before it is looked at more seriously?
Now I can see if this were an isolated case of a member calling out a moderator over some petty squabble, but I could probably pull up a list of threads just like this one if I queried "loumaag" in the search function of this forum.
The issue with loumaag is not his inability to moderate. The main issue is his mouth. He's never short on smug comments. It's not enough to close a thread, he's always gotta have his little zinger in there right before he does. Just in general, the way he conducts himself in this forum is not representative of a moderator IMO, and it's obviously rubbing a LOT of people the wrong way.
I'll just say this one time.. From one webmaster to another. I understand that the way you run this site is not a democracy. But it's never good when you begin to fall out of the good graces of your general user base. I might consider giving us a bit more credit..