Repeater Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

cohenner5377

Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2003
Messages
348
Location
Baltimore, MD
Is it possible to have more than one frequency on a repeater? I know they have to be on the same band. We are looking at putting a second frequency on the repeater that we already have, however, the radios that are being used will have a frequency on a second repeater as well.

David
 

jim202

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
2,736
Location
New Orleans region
To answer your question, Yes and No.

By that I mean the radio can have multiple frequencies, but the repeater system
won't work very well with a second channel. Reason for this is that most repeaters
have a duplexer or filter system to keep the transmitter from causing interference
to the receiver. This filter system is very frequency sensitive. Moving just a
channel or so each side of where they are tuned will cause problems.

Jim



cohenner5377 said:
Is it possible to have more than one frequency on a repeater? I know they have to be on the same band. We are looking at putting a second frequency on the repeater that we already have, however, the radios that are being used will have a frequency on a second repeater as well.

David
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,644
Location
Bowie, Md.
cohenner5377 said:
Is it possible to have more than one frequency on a repeater? I know they have to be on the same band. We are looking at putting a second frequency on the repeater that we already have, however, the radios that are being used will have a frequency on a second repeater as well.

David

The 2nd frequency need not be on the same band, if you are talking about a ham repeater. It's done very frequently - numerous systems have links on 2, 220 450 even the 6 and 10 meter band. The BRATS repeater system in our area is a case in point. It has a 450 system which is linked to 147.03

73s Mike
 

SkipSanders

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,059
Two frequencies, two repeaters. You need a reciever on the new channel (your current one is busy listening to the original channel), and you need a transmitter for the new channel (your old transmitter is busy transmitting on the old channel).

Oh, if you want to junk the entire system, radios, repeater, and all, you could get a new system with multiple 'channels' on one actual rf channel, CDMA/TDMA style, but I don't think you want to do that. <grin>

You can have one repeater linked to multiple transmitters and receivers, yes, but you don't get seperate channels that way. You get everything mashed onto one channel. What do you actually want to do?
 

mlevin

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
2,527
Location
Baltimore, MD
David if you don't mind me butting in here....

He already has one frequency on one repeater. He has that freq split into two channel using two different Pl Tones. This is all off of the same repeater. He wants to know if it would be possible to add another frequency and have that repeaterized (Is that a word?lol) as well using the same repeater/equipment.
 

Don_Burke

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Messages
1,184
Location
Southeastern Virginia
mlevin said:
David if you don't mind me butting in here....

He already has one frequency on one repeater. He has that freq split into two channel using two different Pl Tones. This is all off of the same repeater. He wants to know if it would be possible to add another frequency and have that repeaterized (Is that a word?lol) as well using the same repeater/equipment.
With the right setup, the antenna(s) can be shared, but everything else will need to be duplicated.
 

shawnerz

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
13
Location
TX
One possible way to do it is to use the Motorola F1/F2 scheme. This is assuming, of course, that your console supports this. If you don't have duplexers or combiners on the repeater, this might work for you.
The advantage of this is cost. The disadvantage is if the repeater is in F2 mode, you can't hear calls on F1 and visa versa.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top