atms169 said:
If you are in the Webb County area, look up 147.36. It's digital but I can't decode it. It's not always on either so it makes it hard to figure it out.
Good luck!
Very strange...
http://www.jfindu.net/dstarlh.aspx?rptr=KE5KAF
KE5KAF C Laredo- DStar repeater on the US Root DStar Network
No one has developed a bandwidth conserving dynamically routed system with other perceptually coded NB voice/data emission types as an alternative to DStar.
Part 97 subpart A *drives* the ARS to the furtherance of the radio art and technology innovation. Home Brew DStar and the nexgen gateway is coming soon that greatly expands the capabilities.
The DD at 1.2 GHz is a really powerful tool for amateurs to leverage of linking TCP/IP communications for EMCOM and public service events.
I'm not trying to poke ribs here....but just providing an alternative view of what amateurs are accomplishing now and laying a new technology path for a few years downstream.
DStar is just another tool in the box....but it is getting an increasingly sharper edge!
P25 has been leveraged in some areas, but the lower data throughput on the CAI does not provide as much simultaneous voice data capability as the DStar protocol as currently implemented.
Testing here in Dallas since 2003 shows that the current DStar user radios and Icom repeaters work as well or better than collocated analog systems, particularly in weak signal areas. The RX sensitivity on the Icom repeaters is good. but a little below the highend /\/\ platforms. We've come up with some good enhancements for that.
Add the simultaneous data, callsign Layer2/3 routing, and conserved spectrum, and I'd say IMHO that amateurs are furthering the radio art.
Most of all.....WE ARE HAVING FUN!!!
Craig A. Green KV5E
NE5R DStar SYstem Administrator